Diagnosis / The Risk of World War 3

The Risk of World War 3

 
"There is the official view of World War II—the one we have all been taught—then, there is the one presented here: very different, and very disturbing. This alternative view argues that the aims of the national leaders were not democracy and self-determination, but were, as wars generally are, opportunities to suppress class rebellion. Furthermore, Spritzler maintains, the myths of World War II are the same myths that are being used today in the "war against terrorism" by government and corporate leaders to control people and pursue ends that have nothing to do with protecting us from terrorism." John Spritzler holds a Doctor of Science degree from the Harvard School of Public Health, where he is employed as a Research Scientist.
 
 
 
 
 
 
'Washington’s New Lock-Step March of Folly'. - "Exclusive: Confident in a Hillary Clinton victory, Washington’s foreign policy elite is readying plans for more warfare in Syria and more confrontations with nuclear-armed Russia, an across-the-spectrum “group think” that risks life on the planet, says Robert Parry." Oct 2016
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Russian View