The "War on Terror"
US 'Anti-Terror' Law, 2001 = Blueprint to US State Terror:
“The President is authorized to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons, in order to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States", 2001 AUMF
"I have been campaigning against the Neocons and the Neocon Wars since January 2002, when I first realised Dick Cheney and the PNAC crowd were going to use 9/11 as the pretext to launch a disastrous invasion of Iraq. This has nothing to do with Russia. It has EVERYTHING to do with the massive lies constantly told by the UK & US governments about their illegal Wars of Aggression." - Sky statement - why I'm not a Russian bot, April 2018
"[But] Cameron and his neoconservative allies are preparing the ground for the government’s next onslaught. The target will not be terrorism, but “non-violent extremism”. Next month, from nursery schools to optometrists, health services to universities, all will be legally obliged to monitor students and patients for any sign of “extremism” or “radicalisation”. The new powers represent a level of embedded security surveillance in public life unprecedented in peacetime." By scapegoating Muslims, Cameron fuels radicalisation, 2015, Seumas Milne, Guardian
The Patriot Act undermine US Constitution
"Does the Executive Branch—including, specifically, the Pentagon and the CIA—possess unreviewable power under the US Constitution to carry out targeted killings of Americans overseas? (..) Yet political accountability presupposes public access to information. The public cannot meaningfully evaluate a policy whose contours are secret." Assassination and the Constitution, 2012
"President Obama—the man who ran for president promising to end the Bush Administration’s signature methods of fighting terrorism—is still in office. (..) But the War on Terror has not only stayed with us, it’s growing. Bills currently in Congress go well beyond the already broad bounds of the Bush Administration’s War on Terror policies. Yes, the timing is odd, but only if one cares about evidence, logic, cause-and-effect relationships, and other possibly outmoded concepts." An Endless War on Terror?, 2011, Mariner
"What is now known as Subtitle D of the NDAA—the section on detention (...) the bills, introduced by Representative Buck McKeon and Senator John McCain, respectively, were meant to shift counterterrorism responsibilities from law enforcement to the military. The clear goal of the two bills was to require that suspected terrorists either be tried before military commissions or be held in indefinite detention without charge." The National Defense Authorization Act Explained, 2011, J Mariner
"First, the government was uncooperative; it refused to provide any information about the Bush administration’s system of secret CIA detention, claiming that such information was classified." The Trial of Aafia Siddiqui, 2010
"While the Bush administration had an active drone warfare program, US reliance on drones increased greatly after President Obama took office." The Legality of Drone Warfare, 2010
“I do n’t think there’s any question but that we are at war,” said Eric Holder at his confirmation hearing in January, referring to al Qaeda attacks on US targets from the 1990s onward." Obama’s War on Terror, 2009
"...A disturbing trend is afoot. In the past couple of months, in two countries, governments have relied on broadly-worded terrorism laws to put down social protests. Political demonstrators in El Salvador and London..." Terrorizing Social Protest, 2007
"Governments are increasingly taking actions in the name of counter-terrorism that violate basic human rights norms. International bodies such as the United Nations are not only failing to impede such actions, but are in some ways encouraging them." Security, Terrorism and Human Rights, 2006, Mariner
"Section 501 of the bill, deceptively titled “Expatriation of Terrorists,” would allow the presumptive denationalization of American citizens who support the activities of organizations that the executive branch has deemed “terrorist.” Patriot Act II’s Attack on Citizenship, 2003
"From broad concern felt among Americans from both the September 11 attacks and the 2001 anthrax attacks, Congress rushed to pass legislation to strengthen security controls." WikipediaThe Anthrax Terror - was committed by US state people
"The anthrax letter attacks occurred from September through November of 2001, killing five and wounding many. The attacks were widely held to be the work of Muslims and were used to support the invasion of Afghanistan and, later, the invasion of Iraq. They were used explicitly and repeatedly to justify the passing of the Patriot Act. They were also meant to support withdrawal from the Antiballistic Missile Treaty, a withdrawal eagerly sought by the neoconservatives associated with the Project for a New American Century who wished to pursue their global agenda without obstruction from small states with WMD. In the early days of the attacks there were several perpetrator hypotheses in play. One that gained prominence was the Double Perpetrator hypothesis according to which Iraq had supplied the sophisticated anthrax spores while al-Qaeda had supplied the foot soldiers responsible for preparing and sending the letters. This hypothesis was eagerly reported by the mainstream media. It came to grief quickly when scientists discovered that the anthrax spores had a domestic source and appeared to come from the heart of the US military and intelligence communities. The FBI rapidly began a search for "the anthrax killer," promoting the idea that there was a lone wolf perpetrator within the military community--a renegade, an unbalanced person whose behavior revealed nothing of significance about structures and institutions of the deep state. In 2008 the Bureau named Dr. Bruce Ivins of the United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases as the "anthrax killer." Ivins had conveniently died a week before being named and could not fight back in court. Ivins remains the FBI's choice to this day: the case was closed in 2010. This book support with a great deal of evidence the following four assertions: (a) the anthrax letter attacks were carried out by a group of perpetrators, not by a lone wolf; (b) the group that perpetrated this crime was composed, in whole or in part, of deep insiders within the U.S. state apparatus; (c) these insiders were connected to the perpetrators of the 9/11 attacks; (d) the anthrax attacks were meant to play an important role in the strategy of redefinition through which the Cold War was replaced by a new global conflict framework, the Global War on Terror." The 2001 Anthrax Deception: The Case for a Domestic Conspiracy, 2014by Graeme MacQueen
|
|
|
|
Crime of 9/11 Legitimizes a 'War on Terror' on Civilization |
|
|
|
|
“I knew from day one that this was a controlled event. The official story is simply non-sense. And if you listen to the testimony, the people on the ground and the firemen, they are reporting exactly what I would expect, boom, boom, boom." -- Tom Sullivan - Former Explosives Loader for Controlled Demolition, Inc. (CDI - World's leading demolition company)
People who believe the official explanation of 9/11 are as unscientific as people believing that the earth was created 6.000 years ago. -- Professor Mark Crispin Miller
A couple of facts: Bush/Cheney's 9/11 Commission didn't investigate the evidence (400 truck loads going away with the evidence a day, no investigatation for explosives, thermite etc.); the final report contradicts Newtonian physics; such a steel building cannot and never has collapsed due to fire; 12.000 witness testimony about explosions from firemen and other witnesses were left out in the report; BBC reported the fall of WTC 7 twenty minutes before it collapsed (video below); WTC7 was not in the NIST final report. -- Homo Sociologicus
Given the fact that before September 11, 2001 no high-rise steel-frame building has ever collapsed from fire alone (Taylor, 2011), extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. The NIST Reports did not address the total collapse of the Twin Towers, truncating their study at “collapse initiation.” Overall, our peer-reviewed literature results collectively yield a very strong prima facie argument for controlled demolition.
If it is true that steel-frame buildings can collapse from fire alone, it is crucial for owners of existing structures and insurers to understand the risk of a sudden fire-induced collapse so that structural repairs and risk adjustments can be factored in. Given the official story, it is remarkable how little insurance premiums, or even design parameters and building construction codes, have been modified (if at all) to address the possibility of catastrophic fire-induced progressive collapse. The fact that they have not been modified indicates that insurance companies do not accept the PC hypothesis. -- Timothy Eastman and Jonathan Cole, 'WTC Destruction: Review of the Technical Literature 2001-2012', 2013
Science is about checking the evidence! - Whoever is responsible for bringing to grisly fruition this new false-flag operation, which has been used to justify the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq as well as unprecedented assaults on research, education, and civil liberties, must be perversely proud of their efficient handiwork. -- Lynn Margulis
There exists a shadowy government with its own Air Force, its own navy, its own fundraising mechanism, and the ability to pursue its own ideas of the national interest, free from all checks and balances, and free from the law itself. – Senator Daniel K. Inouye during the Iran-contra scandal
The "PATRIOT Act" is a repressive "coordination" of the entities of force and deception, the police, intelligence and the military. It broadens, centralizes and combines the surveillance, arrest and harassment capabilities of the police and intelligence apparatus. Homeland defense is, in essence, a form of state terrorism directed against the American people and democracy itself. It is the Pentagon Inc. declaring war on America. Frank Morales, 2003
Think about it. Are you outraged at the thought of being held without charge by your own government? Now consider being held indefinitely by someone else’s (the US') government. -- J Mariner, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/11 Beginners 101
"I knew from day one that this was a controlled event. The official story is simply non-sense. And if you listen to the testimony, the people on the ground and the firemen, they are reporting exactly what I would expect, boom, boom, boom." - 'Tom Sullivan - Former Explosives Loader for Controlled Demolition, Inc. (CDI) [World's leading demolition company] ' Tom Sullivan - Explosives Technician - Loader - AE911Truth.org
"In August of 2016, a former employee of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) began looking into the reports his agency had released years earlier on the collapse of the World Trade Center. What he found shook him to the core. In this poignant half-hour interview (..) Mr. Ketcham inspires us to believe that we can all muster the courage to confront the truth." A NIST Government Researcher Speaks Out, 2017
Gore Vidal asks some critical questions, explained in The Guardian: "At the heart of the essay are questions about the events of 9/11 itself and the two hours after the planes were hijacked. Vidal writes that 'astonished military experts cannot fathom why the government's "automatic standard order of procedure in the event of a hijacking" was not followed'." Gore Vidal claims 'Bush junta' complicit in 9/11, 2002, The Guardian
The first link on top of this Corbett Report will convince you that Rumsfeld deliberately did NOT use his power and betrayed his responsibility when hearing about planes hitting the World Trade Towers - instead doing trivial stuff for an hour or so... : Episode 280 (2013) – Who Was Really Behind the 9/11 Attacks?
This video with estimed academics shows how the academic community has been almost completely silencing the truth and critical questions, helping to suppress if not ridicule the most important basic scientific/critical journalistic questions. Inclusive compelling natural science explanations: 9-11 in the Academic Community
"On the tenth anniversary of the Attacks of September 11th, 2001, expert witnesses gathered at Ryerson University in Toronto, Canada to provide evidence-based research that called into question the official story of 9/11. This was known as The Toronto Hearings on 9/11." 9/11: Decade of Deception (2015) More Toronto Below/Right
"BBC who reported the collapse of WTC 7 over 20 minutes before it actually fell, and the judge accepted Rooke’s argument. (...) "Under Section 363 of the Communications Act, citizens of the UK are required to purchase an annual license in order to use a television receiver. Rooke refused to pay the license fee due to a section of the Terrorism Act that states: ' It is an offence for someone to invite another to provide money, intending that it should be used, or having reasonable cause to suspect that it may be used, for terrorism purposes.' The fact that the BBC reported the collapse of WTC 7 twenty-three minutes before it actually fell indicates that the UK was aware of the attacks on 9/11 before they actually happened. The direct implication is that they were working with the “terrorists”, all arguments as to who the terrorists actually were aside." - In Rooke’s statement to the court: “I believe the BBC, who are directly funded by the licence fee, are furthering the purposes of terrorism and I have incontrovertible evidence to this effect. I do not use this word lightly given where I am.” Although he was not allowed to show his video evidence in court due to the District Judge deeming it irrelevant to the trial, the fact that the BBC reported WTC 7’s collapse over 20 minutes beforehand proved to be evidence enough. - He also made reference to the theories behind the collapse of WTC 7 being a controlled demolition, as the evidence suggests. In an additional statement:" Read on BBC Foreknowledge of 9/11 Collapse of WTC Building Seven: British Man Won Law Suit against BBC for 9/11 Cover Up
Critical Thought from Social Scientists and Intellectuals on 9/11
"The day will live in infamy, the attacks planned well in advance. Bin Laden and so-called “crazed Arabs” had nothing to do with destroying the twin towers and striking the Pentagon. The Big Lie persists. Most Americans no longer believe the 9/11 whitewash commission’s official account of what happened. Bin Laden was an unwitting CIA asset transformed into “Enemy Number One.” In December 2001, he died of natural causes in a Pakistani hospital, widely reported at the time – including by The New York Times (several months later), Fox News and the BBC. Obama didn’t kill Osama. In September 2001, CBS News anchor Dan Rather said he was admitted to a Rawalpindi, Pakistan hospital on September 10, 2001. France’s Le Figaro reported: (...)" Read: 'The Disturbing Aftermath of 9/11', 9/11, 2017, by Stephen Lendman
Thierry Meyssan: "It is astonishing that the world press has echoed the official version, on the one hand because it is absurd and on the other hand because it fails to explain events. The idea that a fanatic, based in a cave in Afghanistan, and twenty individuals, armed with box cutters, could have destroyed the World Trade Center and hit the Pentagon before the most powerful army in the world had time to react, is not even worthy of a comic-book plot . The more a story is grotesquely illogical, the less western journalists ask questions. - Moreover, the official version fails to account for stock market speculation on companies affected by the attacks, for the fire in the White House Annex, or the collapse of the third tower of the World Trade Center in the afternoon. None of these events are even mentioned in the final report of the Presidential Commission of Inquiry." "Syrian terrorists were trained by the KLA in Kosovo", 2012
"Christopher Bollyn (...) helped Professor Steven E. Jones in the spring and summer of 2006, when Jones found solid evidence of Thermite in the dust of the Twin Towers. The discovery and discussion of Thermite in the demolition of the World Trade Center led to serious trouble for both Jones and Bollyn. (...) 9/11, links to Israel, the mossad, and the crime within a crime is all discussed with Bollyn in an uncensored discussion with Sean Stone. The disposal of evidence, promotion of a scripted story, and how Ehud Barak and Benjamin Netanyahu are involved, plus the accusation of anti-semitism levelled against those that explore the connection to the Israeli government and intelligence are all explored." 9/11, Israel & the Mossad Investigated with Bollyn, 2015
"An investigative journalist from Illinois, Bollyn sojourned in Europe and the Middle East before studying languages, history and journalism at UC Davis and Santa Cruz. His degree in history focused on the Israeli occupation of Palestine. He has written in-depth articles about the Middle East, electronic vote fraud, the dangers of depleted uranium, and the history and geo-political background of 9/11. Christopher Bollyn: "Solving 911 Ends the War on Terror", 2015
Homo Sociologicus (HS): Bush/Cheney said Al Qaeda was behind 9/11. All Western politicians & media went along. But we now know Al Qaeda was CIA. wtf! - So which is it: did Bush & Cheney lie about Al Qaeda behind. Or did CIA do it while Bush & Cheney were in on it? - HS page on NATO behind Al Qaeda/ISIS
HS: 9/11, arguably the biggest crime in American history was not examined as a crime scene. Instead, the evidence was (quickly) removed and shipped away to China, so that no-one could examine the evidence. They began driving the remains away from the scene of the crime within hours. It took the Bush government more than 411 days to form a commission. The official report did not even mention the third 'Tower 7'. Just as the media silenced 'Tower 7' at 9/11 2001. Moreover, the 'science' that explains the towers' collapse in the report goes against Newton's laws of physics.
Henry Kissinger was initially made head of the commission, but public outrage caused him to decline. Instead Philip D. Zelikow became the executive in charge of what went in, and what didn't go into the 9/11 report. Zelikow was very close to the Bush government long before 9/11. He had written a book with Condaleeza Rice, GW Bush's National Security Advisor. He is also known as a specialist in Public Myth Making. Excerpt from Wikipedia on Zelikow: "While at Harvard, he worked with Ernest May and Richard Neustadt on the use, and misuse, of history in policymaking. They observed, as Zelikow noted in his own words, that "contemporary" history is "defined functionally by those critical people and events that go into forming the public's presumptions about its immediate past. The idea of 'public presumption'," he explained, "is akin to William McNeill's notion of 'public myth' but without the negative implication sometimes invoked by the word 'myth.' Such presumptions are beliefs (1) thought to be true (although not necessarily known to be true with certainty), and (2) shared in common within the relevant political community."[23] " https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_D._Zelikow
"The conspiracies that won't go away: Brother of 9/11 victim claim the US orchestrated the atrocity as new study shows it was impossible that the third tower collapsed from fire' (Sep, 2017): "The official version is that the Twin Towers collapsed because their steel columns were melted by the heat from the fuel fires of the two crashed planes. This explanation has been repeated in White House briefings, official inquiries into 9/11, leaks by the U.S. intelligence services and almost every TV documentary on the attack in the U.S. and the UK. However, sceptics say the science does not stand up. They argue that steel does not begin to melt until it reaches around 2,800f, and open fires of jet fuel — such as those in the Twin Towers inferno — cannot burn hotter than 1,700f. Official reports state the steel in the third tower reached a maximum of 1,100f. Professor Griffin and other sceptics believe the Twin Towers were deliberately blown up. They claim their controversial theory is corroborated by first-hand testimony from firefighters at the scene. In oral histories of 9/11 by New York Fire Department staff which have been made public, almost a quarter suggest they heard explosions going off before the World Trade Centre towers collapsed." Read article, Sep, 2017
Peter Dale Scott: "I don't usually have time to review videos. But I strongly recommend this one - and not just for those who may still be unaware of the billions unquestionably made by those with inside knowledge of 9/11. Much of the info here is old and unquestioned. A lot, especially at the outset, was new, at least for me. Corbett has done a superb job." Sept, 2017 - 9/11 Trillions: Follow The Money, 2015, Corbett Report
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Important Journalist Michael Ruppert's Research on 9/11
Who was Michael Ruppert? - "Abby Martin gives a heartfelt tribute to investigative journalist and former LAPD detective, Michael C. Ruppert, highlighting his career from exposing CIA drug trafficking to his groundbreaking research on 'Peak Energy' and remember his sincere devotion to truth and justice." Link YouTube 2014
"Mike indicts Dave Frasca, head of the FBI’s Radical Fundamentalist Unit for a long list of mole-like activities, for which he was promoted after 9/11. “I would call him a suspect,” says Mike, to great applause! - Mike brilliantly opens up the “War Games” can of worms and busts Condoleezza Rice, the White House, and Richard Myers, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff for their lies and complicity in 9/11." Mike Ruppert 2004 “Why No Air Force Response To 9/11 Attack”
Crossing the Rubicon: The Decline of the American Empire at the End of the Age of Oil, 2004, Michael C. Ruppert & C. Austin Fitts:
"The attacks of September 11, 2001, were accomplished through an amazing orchestration of logistics and personnel. Crossing the Rubicon discovers and identifies key suspects—finding some of them in the highest echelons of American government—by showing how they acted in concert to guarantee that the attacks produced the desired result. - Crossing the Rubicon is unique not only for its case-breaking examination of 9/11, but for the breadth and depth of its world picture—an interdisciplinary analysis of petroleum, geopolitics, narcotraffic, intelligence and militarism—without which 9/11 cannot be understood." Free book pdf Some of the praise for Rubicon: "Mike Ruppert represents, from top to bottom, the best tradition of an independent thinking, open-minded, uncorrupt able, humorous, prudent, American Cop. After running during his police career into conflicts with the drug dealing part of the CIA, Mike knows that government information seldom equals its disinformation. The doubt about the official 9/11 story brought us together. From the first day after 9/11, I could follow his scouting into the real world behind government propaganda. I firmly believe at the end of three years of conducting a really independent investigation, that Ruppert is not only heading in the right direction, but also touching the inner sanctum of the hidden government agenda." (source free pdf above) — Andreas Von Bulow, former German Cabinet Minister and Parliamentary Secretary, author of The CIA and September 11
"In a sector rife with disinformation and ill-informed comment, Michael Ruppert's work stands out as a conspicuous beacon of valuable well-informed analysis. His claims are bold and contrarian and have dramatic implications for the global oil price should the global economy experience a sustained recovery while Iraqi oil supplies are curtailed. Ruppert believes (with ample documentation to justify his view) that depletion dynamics will fuel energy price appreciation more in this cycle than any prior one. If he is anywhere near correct, as we believe, the oil market will begin an historic cyclical upmove with a tighter supply demand balance than at any prior cycle. For anyone wishing to understand the full ramifications of this for the energy markets and global economy, Ruppert's work is invaluable." - Marshall Auerback, international portfolio strategist for David W. Tice & Associates, Inc., and weekly contributor to www.prudentbear.com
More Important 'Big Narrative' Research Literature
"9/11 Ten Years Later is David Ray Griffin s tenth book about 9/11. Asking in the first chapter whether 9/11 justified the war in Afghanistan, he explains why it did not. In the following three chapters, devoted to the destruction of the World Trade Center, Griffin asks why otherwise rational journalists have endorsed miracles (understood as events that contradict laws of science). Also, introducing the book's theme, Griffin points out that 9/11 has been categorized by some social scientists as a state crime against democracy." 9/11 Ten Years Later: When State Crimes Against Democracy Succeed, 2011, David Ray Griffin
Amazon praise for Bollyn's work: "A genius who sacrificed his entire life to unveil cause of 9/11, the seminal event of our lifetime. The Israel connection is painstakingly described, leaving not a scintilla of doubt in my mind that 9/11 was a Likud/Mossad False Flag event to suck the west into a Crusade against Israel's neighbors for the sake of Rothschild Israel and US military and oil interests. This has nothing to do with he Jewish people as a whole who are identified with the Jewish past or faith. No Jew I know would have countenanced this horrific act on the part of Zionists. I'm a Jew and faced up to the fact of 9/11, albeit very reluctantly. But Jews must face the facts and not live the lie or live solely within a narrow Jewish ideological framework. Jew must not hide from the truth and this book goes a long way to help Jews understand the facts of 9/11. They can then condemn Likud for the monstrous, evil holocaust of 9/11 and develop real bridges to Palestinians, long overdo." Solving 9-11: The Deception That Changed the World, 2012, Christopher Lee Bollyn
"The events of September 11, 2001, set off a chain of global crises and civil perils that have normalized a climate of fear and conflict. Starting with assaults on the U.S. Constitution, Griffin reviews various ways in which the world has been made worse over the past fifteen years by the Bush-Cheney reaction to the attacks and by power plays for global influence enabled by 9/11. These include the disastrous effects of regime-change operations in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya; the war on terror, the rise of ISIS, the Syrian conflict and European refugee crisis; the explosion of Islamophobia and the American acceptance of extrajudicial murder-by-drone; and the growing existential threats of ecological and nuclear holocaust. Looking back, it is clear that the story of 9/11 has been used to legitimize and manufacture support for disastrous policies." Bush and Cheney: How They Ruined America and the World, 2017, David Ray Griffin
"In 2004, David Ray Griffin published The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions about the Bush Administration and 9/11. Translated into several languages, it helped spark a worldwide movement demanding "9/11 truth." Even as it became increasingly outdated, it continued to be widely cited as the best introduction to the issues. Griffin has now written The New Pearl Harbor Revisited, which provides a chapter-by-chapter updating of the information provided in that earlier book. It shows that the case against the official account constructed by independent researchers---who now include architects, engineers, physicists, pilots, politicians, and former military officers---is far stronger than it was in 2004, leaving no doubt that 9/11 was a false-flag operation, designed to give the Bush-Cheney administration a pretext to attack oil-rich Muslim nations. - Taken together, these two books provide everything one needs to make an informed decision about 9/11---whether one is a journalist, a political leader, a religious leader, or an ordinary citizen concerned about truth, democracy, and the rule of law." The New Pearl Harbor Revisited: 9/11, the Cover-Up, and the Exposé, 2008, David Ray Griffin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Alan Sabrosky, former professor at the U.S. Army War College and the U.S. Military Academy, did not hesitate to proclaim his belief that September 11 is a "classical operation orchestrated by Mossad" carried out with accomplices within the United States government, and his voice has been forcefully echoed by some U.S. Army veterans sites who are disgusted by the vile war that they were forced to wage on behalf of the September 11 lie or that of the weapons of mass destruction of Saddam Hussein." September 11: Inside Job or Mossad Job?, 2013, by Laurent Guyénot, Voltaire
"Following the U.S. declaration of a "war on terror," Washington hawks were quick to label Iraq part of an "axis of evil." After a tense build-up, in March 2003 the United States and Britain invaded Iraq, purportedly to protect Western publics from weapons of mass destruction (WMD). But was this the real reason, or simply a convenient pretext to veil a covert agenda? - Using official sources, Ahmed investigates U.S. and British claims about Iraq’s WMD programs and in the process reveals the hidden motives behind the 2003 invasion and the grand strategy of which it is a part. He shows that the true goals of U.S.-British policy in the Middle East are camouflaged by spin, P.R. declarations and seemingly noble words.
The reality can only be comprehended through knowledge of the history of Western intervention in the region. Ahmed demonstrates that such intervention has been dictated ruthlessly by economic and political interests, with little regard for human rights. He traces events of the past decades, beginning with the West’s support for the highly repressive Shah of Iran, his subsequent usurpation by the Ayatollah’s Islamist regime and the West’s resultant backing of Saddam Hussein. The sponsorship of Saddam’s tyranny—a self-serving tactic intended to strategically counterbalance Iran—included the supply of technology to build WMD, as well as tacit complicity in their use against Iranians and Kurds. - Ahmed’s meticulous research into the secret history of Western maneuverings in the Middle East since the collapse of the Ottoman Empire reveals the actual causes of the first Gulf War, the humanitarian catastrophe created by the 12-year sanctions policy against Iraq, and the consistent obstructions of the Oil for Food program. He also provides information on the West’s own widespread use of WMD, and the likely culprits of the 2001 anthrax attacks in the U.S." Behind the War on Terror: Western Secret Strategy and the Struggle for Iraq, 2003, Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed
Description: "After a decade of investigation, the long-time co-editor of the Journal of 9/11 Studies, Kevin Ryan, offers an evidence-based analysis of nineteen other suspects. - Although a number of books have demonstrated that the official accounts are false, Another Nineteen takes the next, crucial step toward a new investigation into the crimes of 9/11. With the support of victim's families and leading 9/11 researchers, Ryan examines nineteen suspects who were in position to accomplish major elements of the crimes that still need to be explained. Detailed evidence is presented that reveals how each of the alternative suspects had the means, motive and opportunity to accomplish one or more aspects of the 9/11 events. In light of a forty-year history of deep events and crimes against democracy, Ryan shows how 9/11 fits into the pattern of a deep state operation, how the alternate suspects worked together throughout that history, how each was connected to two men who were in perfect position to coordinate the attacks, and how these suspects can either be charged with 9/11 crimes today or further investigated in focused ways."
Amazon reviewer: "How much do you know about Vice President Dick Cheney, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, Frank Carlucci of the Carlyle Group, Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage, FBI Director Louis Freeh, CIA Director George Tenet, "Counterterrorism Czar" Richard Clarke, FAA hijack coordinator Michael Canavan, FAA Command Center operations manager Benedict Sliney, General Ralph Eberhart of NORAD, Carl Truscott of the Secret Service, former CIA Director John Deutch, Undersecretary of Defense John Hamre, Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitiz, Peter Janson of AMEC Construction, Iraq Occupation Governor L. Paul Bremer, National Commission on Terrorism Advisor Brian Michael Jenkins, Wirt Walker of KuwAm Corp., Barry McDaniel of Stratesec, New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, Duane Andrews of SAIC, Congressman Porter Goss (That's more than 19, and there are actually more mentioned in the book.) Do you know about Richard Clarke's close ties with the United Arab Emirates? Did you know that L. Paul Bremer's parent company occupied the exact floors where the North Tower was struck by Flight 11, or that another company Bremer directed patented a thermite demolition device? This book provides extensive background on many key individuals and connects the dots. A common objection to the idea of insider participation in 9/11 is that people cannot imagine Americans who would actually do such a thing. This book makes insider participation much more understandable and believable. The result is not to close the book on who did 9/11; it rather opens the book, exposes the players, and calls for a real investigation. It is a masterpiece of deep reporting." Another Nineteen: Investigating Legitimate 9/11 Suspects, 2013, Kevin Ryan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
“Let's start with science, not conspiracies, when it comes to 9/11Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth
“Terrorism has replaced Communism as the rationale for the militarization of America, for military adventures abroad, and for the suppression of civil liberties at home. It serves the same purpose, serving to create hysteria.Howard Zinn
Science/Physics/Engineering
"Let's start with science, not conspiracies, when it comes to 9/11"
“It bears repeating that fires have never caused the total collapse of a steel-framed high-rise before or since 9/11. Did we witness an unprecedented event three separate times on September 11, 2001? The NIST [U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology] reports, which attempted to support that unlikely conclusion, fail to persuade a growing number of architects, engineers, and scientists. Instead, the evidence points overwhelmingly to the conclusion that all three buildings were destroyed by controlled demolition. Given the far-reaching implications, it is morally imperative that this hypothesis be the subject of a truly scientific and impartial investigation by responsible authorities.” “15 Years Later: On the Physics of High-Rise Building Collapses”
Professor Piers Robinson: "The most authoritative study to date, which concludes WTC7 could not have been brought down by fire, Prof. Hulsey's study": http://www.wtc7evaluation.org
Problems Official Report
Witnesses & Explosions
Post-9/11 War on Journalism
"It is a telling sign of the times that Hersh is once again under attack for his reporting. Last week, just as Hersh was giving a speech in which he publicly warned that journalists were frightened and intimidated, senior Pentagon advisor Richard Perle was telling the New York Sun that he planned to file suit against Hersh for libel." Suing Seymour Hersh, 2003, Mariner
The Taboo of 9/11
People who won't question the official 9/11 expl. basically say: don't question Bush, Cheney & Rumsfeld, let them get away with lies leading to nation destruction & mass murder.
Toronto Hearings 2011
Toronto Hearings will be added here
|
