|
|
|
|
NOTES on CIA, PENTAGON, Ellsberg & Chomsky etc.21-10-2018 20:29 "But my contention here is that the US crimes in the same period (since 1945) have only been superficially recorded, let alone documented, let alone acknowledged, let alone recognised as crimes at all. I believe this must be addressed and that the truth has considerable bearing on where the world stands now. Although constrained, to a certain extent, by the existence of the Soviet Union, the United States’ actions throughout the world made it clear that it had concluded it had carte blanche to do what it liked.Direct invasion of a sovereign state has never in fact been America’s favoured method. In the main, it has preferred what it has described as ‘low intensity conflict’. Low intensity conflict means that thousands of people die but slower than if you dropped a bomb on them in one fell swoop. It means that you infect the heart of the country, that you establish a malignant growth and watch the gangrene bloom. When the populace has been subdued – or beaten to death – the same thing – and your own friends, the military and the great corporations, sit comfortably in power, you go before the camera and say that democracy has prevailed. This was a commonplace in US foreign policy in the years to which I refer." - Harold Pinter, Nobel Prize Speech, 2005, Link
Trump to use Obama's nuclear arms - or is it fear as terror?
Recently we could read in a Washington Post headline: 'Trump to tell Russia U.S. is pulling out of nuclear forces treaty'. The article had this Orwellian double speak explanation: “President Reagan concluded this treaty to reduce the risk of war in Europe,” Mr. Engel said. “We owe it to our allies and to the American people to do everything we can to bring Russia back into compliance and preserve peace." Link
I can't believe this nuclear prospect myself. So, what to think? My logic tells me that the US will begin using 'practical nuclear arms'. But, alternatively, this move together wih the general military mobilizing is also a way to get a more firm control of the Western states, the 'danger level' will be used to crush dissent, critical information and suppress people by fear.
In fact, we get both consequences. The still more acute risk of a nuclear war in Europe is in itself a terrible weapon of terror against the European and the Russian people. Political parties and citizens need to protest and stop this insane move by the US.
The US already has a great tradition of using terrible arms. From Agent Orange in Vietnam to using depleted uranium in Yugoslavia, Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, Syria etc., which have had cancer rates skyrocketing in these nations. The radiation's "half time" is 4.5 billion years. Chances are, given the Western media's suppressing all info that might hurt the corporate powers and the military, that you have not even heard about this.
Now let's think a bit about 'real' nuclear bombs. People who have followed me on Facebook, on my old account, will remember that I predicted that ('Ex-CIA') Ellsberg's new book was meant to "normalize", that the US would begin to use the 'practical nuclear' arms that Obama signed a trillion dollar contract to develop: https://www.nytimes.com/…/a-trillion-dollar-nuclear-weapon-…
Again, I have to ask, is it for real, to 'normalize' nuclear bombs. Or is it to scare people. The difficulty here is, that Ellsberg is considered a hero, and 'normalizing' nuclear arms is so insane, that people cannot think it as real, that it might 'materialize'. But please look at the nations which the US/Europe have destroyed. From WW2 bombing of Dresden and nuclear bombs on Hiroshima, Nagasaki to Clinton's Yugoslavia, the destruction of Iraq, Libya, Syria - there are no limits to the Western oligarchs' cynicism.
Obama didn't apologize in Hiroshima a couple of years ago for US nuclear bombs in Hiroshima and Nagasaki (which historians say were completely unnessecary, as Japan was about to surrender). Instead Obama made one of the clinical chilling statements, which the US politicians and bureaucrats for Pentagon are so good at: "Obama will not apologize for Hiroshima attack, he tells Japanese TV. President says he will highlight blossoming of a close relationship between US and Japan, but ‘every leader makes difficult decisions, particularly during war’." https://www.theguardian.com/…/obama-japan-hiroshima-intervi… Let me remind you that the US secretary of state Madeleine Albright said that she thought that 'it was worth it', that the US had ordered sanctions on Iraq, which cost more than of 500,000 dead Iraqi children under the age of 5 years in the 1990'ties. To the best of my knowledge these sanctions had no effect - besides the killing of people in Iraq. And it was worth it. This is a form of unmatched cynicism. But it is typical of the US politicians and diplomats. Remember Harold Pinter's recollection of his meeting with the US Ambassador in London with a delegation from Nicaragua? In Hiroshima, Obama gave another of his excellent double-plus-good-speeches, saying that we should have a world free of nuclear weapons (yes, after signing a trillion dollars contract to make them), and that nuclear use can be a necessity. 'Obama in Hiroshima calls for 'world without nuclear weapons'.' 2016, CNN: https://edition.cnn.com/…/…/obama-hiroshima-japan/index.html
ELLSBERG and CHOMSKY as CONTROLLED OPPOSITION
The most important CIA researcher Doug Valentine has explained, why we should neither trust Ellsberg nor (his brother in intellectual arms) Noam Chomsky. They were together in the 70'ties and they are together today, telling people what to think - and not think (Chomsky is strong controller of the Bush/Cheney official 9/11 conspiracy). Ellsberg covered up for CIA's horrendous 'Phoenix Program' of using terrorist proxies and paid quislings in Vietnam in the seventies, with his world famous and world reported 'Pentagon Papers'. Later Chomsky similarly covers up the 'Phoenix Program' (ISIS) in Syria. As Doug Valentine explains:
"Left paterfamilias Noam Chomsky, who generally shows an appreciation for the subtleties of covert action, claimed that America is not supplying its Al Qaeda mercenary army with arms – even though Eric Schmidt at The New York Times reported over a year ago that CIA officers in Turkey were “helping allies decide which Syrian opposition fighters across the border will receive arm.” https://www.counterpunch.org/…/the-cia-the-press-and-black…/
Now, as a Danish sociologist trying to figure out the reality of the Western wars, I have shared countless articles on Facebook about the US, Israel, Saudi Arabia, Turkey etc. being behind, arming and training ISIS and Al Qaeda. So, why would Chomsky cover this up? In fact, Chomsky has been consistent in covering up CIA's role exactly like Ellsberg did. This is clear, if you compare his work and public explanations with the most important CIA researcher Doug Valentine, where Doug has an explanation about the power of CIA as being much, much more powerful than Chomsky will ever let you think. I have done what I can to promote Doug's research, as I do here. But I bet that you will look in vain for Chomsky's promotion of Doug's research. Why?
Here Doug Explains something about the likewise famous Daniel Ellsberg:
"The first thing the reader needs to know is that Ellsberg was not always a pacifist “dove” intent on ending the Vietnam War. At first he was an aggressive “hawk.” His militant approach to the Cold War ? he was all for nuking the Soviet Union ? was shaped during a tour of duty as a Marine lieutenant, and precisely because of his hard-line attitude, and his ability to articulate it, he was offered a job as a Defense Department analyst." https://www.counterpunch.org/…/will-the-real-daniel-ellsbe…/
Here we have a promotion piece on Ellsberg and Chomsky from the seventies till today - yes, it is 'historical' all right:
"The fact that Noam and Dan share a history related to the Pentagon Papers will certainly add a historical significance to the event.”
Ellsberg first sent the Pentagon Papers to Chomsky, who, along with Howard Zinn, prepared a fifth volume of the Papers consisting of critical essays by many scholars. Chomsky also defended Ellsberg’s role in releasing the Pentagon Papers (video here.)" https://sbs.arizona.edu/…/daniel-ellsberg-and-noam-chomsky-…
Problems with the Western information: it's a matrix
Now, as should be clear from the Washington Post article here, Trump to tell Russia U.S. is pulling out of nuclear forces treaty, we should have no illusions about Trump being a different president than Obama, Bush and Bill Clinton. The American presidents are not in control. The Council of Foreign Relations and the CIA tell the American president what will happen next. If you go to YouTube you might find videos with Hillary Clinton saying that it is nice to visit the CFR to have explained what to think. Doug Valentine says that the US president and congress are not even allowed to see the original CIA memes, if I remember Doug's exact words. While the famous advisor to John F. Kennedy, John K. Galbraith explained this about the CFR:
"Those of us who had worked for the Kennedy election were tolerated in the government for that reason and had a say, but foreign policy was still with the Council on Foreign Relations people.”
Yes, John F. Kennedy tried to get rid of the CIA. And this caused his death. Noam Chomsky and so many other 'academics' have worked hard to put dirt on Kennedy's real politics and legacy. I have collected some interesting information on the subject here, where it is probably enough that you watch Dr. Wecht's lecture on the top to know, that the murder of JFK was covered up from day one. https://homosociologicus.com/the-murder-of-jfk
It seems that Trump have ideological differences with the Democrats, but he is a member of the American oligarchs, and even if he wanted, he is hardly allowed to do much against the power relations of the US establishment. But it is important for me to say that I have not paid enough attention to Trump to be able to figure this out. I suggest that you look to analysts like Glen Ford at BAR and Diana Johnstone etc.
What keeps people in the greatest ignorance, is, what the Scandinavian peace researcher Jan Oberg calls the 'Military Industrial Media Academic Complex'. https://janoberg.me/…/military-industrial-media-academic-c…/ Here is a quote from Prof. Alfred McCoy's latest book, which is on my page on the Western propaganda apparatus:
"In 2010 (..) Washington Post reported that the national security state had swelled into a “fourth branch” of the federal government ― with 854,000 vetted officials, 263 security organizations, and over 3,000 intelligence units, issuing 50,000 special reports every year." https://truthout.org/…/exploring-the-shadows-of-the-us-sec…/ -- Professor Alfred McCoy, 2017 Here is the link to my page: https://homosociologicus.com/corporate-media-taboos
People have no idea about the size and power of the matrix, which is behind the Western state and media information. All Western politicians use this 'information'. And especially the academic world trust people like Chomsky and Ellsberg to be the most important critical thinkers on such subjects. But please let me know why Chomsky and Ellsberg (nor Seymour Hersh) never promotes Doug Valentine's crucial research on the CIA?
Doug Valentine comes to the same research conclusions and promotes prof Alfred McCoy's research (both have fathers with military careers, which inspired them to their critical research on the truth about the US military).
You migth ask, 'what's the difference' between us knowing that we can't trust people like Chomsky and Ellsberg, if it all points to war anyway?' I will say that the difference is, that you know that the whole Western public sphere (inclusive the academics) are playing you.
Everybody knows that the corporate media betray the Western peoples. The Americans are much more aware than the Europeans. But what is most regularly left out of the explanation about the US wars, is that all the people allowed to speak in the Western public spheres are lying for the US. The corporate media would immediately be held to account, if academics and politicians did not share the same lies, but actually told some truth and had some integrity. There are exceptions to this terrible rule, like when the French government said No to joining the destruction of Iraq. But generally the Western states share the US lies, which legitimizes both the US nation destructions and the other Western nations joining them.
So, the Western peoples to a great extent have no idea how much they are being lied by the academics and politicians, which they listen to and have listened to since 1945. Here is Harold Pinter explaining the problem:
"Political language, as used by politicians, does not venture into any of this territory since the majority of politicians, on the evidence available to us, are interested not in truth but in power and in the maintenance of that power. To maintain that power it is essential that people remain in ignorance, that they live in ignorance of the truth, even the truth of their own lives. What surrounds us therefore is a vast tapestry of lies, upon which we feed.
As every single person here knows, the justification for the invasion of Iraq was that Saddam Hussein possessed a highly dangerous body of weapons of mass destruction, some of which could be fired in 45 minutes, bringing about appalling devastation. We were assured that was true. It was not true. We were told that Iraq had a relationship with Al Quaeda and shared responsibility for the atrocity in New York of September 11th 2001. We were assured that this was true. It was not true. We were told that Iraq threatened the security of the world. We were assured it was true. It was not true.
The truth is something entirely different. The truth is to do with how the United States understands its role in the world and how it chooses to embody it."
This means, that if we shall be able to challenge this tradition, it can only be done by radically challenging the establishment versions. This is the only way, we can hope to know a bit about reality - and be able to fight it. I made my site in the hope that people would use it to educate themselves so as to be able to stand up against their politicians's lies.
Once more, Chomsky and others never tell you, what Harold Pinter told you in his excellent Nobel Prize Speech, namely that all Western governments have had a strong tradition for always sharing and covering up lies for the US' wars (since 1945).
The problem with all these lies may not affect Western people much, when it comes to wars in Iraq, Libya and Syria etc. But now they are lying about Russia and China, and that can mean a war in Europe and on a world scale. Besides, the history of US wars shows us clearly that all information is usually false. Just look at my home page. I have collected information on most of the wars to be able to show exactly this.
CIA and Pentagon People in the Democratic Party
People will remember and can go back and find Chomsky's support for Hillary Clinton and the Democratic Party in general - I think it has been consistent for decades. Here is some information from March 2018 on the CIA and Pentagon people in the Democratic Party:
"In a three-part series published last week, the World Socialist Web Site documented an unprecedented influx of intelligence and military operatives into the Democratic Party. More than 50 such military-intelligence candidates are seeking the Democratic nomination in the 102 districts identified by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee as its targets for 2018. These include both vacant seats and those with Republican incumbents considered vulnerable in the event of a significant swing to the Democrats.
If on November 6 the Democratic Party makes the net gain of 24 seats needed to win control of the House of Representatives, former CIA agents, military commanders, and State Department officials will provide the margin of victory and hold the balance of power in Congress. The presence of so many representatives of the military-intelligence apparatus in the legislature is a situation without precedent in the history of the United States.
Since its establishment in 1947—under the administration of Democratic President Harry Truman—the CIA has been legally barred from carrying out within the United States the activities which were its mission overseas: spying, infiltration, political provocation, assassination. These prohibitions were given official lip service but ignored in practice."
Here is the WSWS with an update in September 2018:
"With the end the primary season, the Democratic Party leadership and their allies in the national security apparatus have completed the first stage of what might be termed a “friendly takeover” of the Democrats by candidates recruited from among military, CIA and civilian national security cadres. (...)
"Of the 44 districts we identified in March—since grown to 46—military-intelligence candidates have won 30 nominations, a success rate of about 66 percent or two-thirds. That testifies to their extensive support from the Democratic Party leadership, from longtime financial backers of the Democrats, and from the top levels of the national security establishment.
There are 115 districts rated as competitive by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) or by groups specializing in the district-by-district analysis of congressional races. The 30 military-intelligence candidates account for more than one quarter of the Democratic candidates in these districts, making them the largest single group, ahead of state and local politicians (26), lawyers (20), millionaires (15), other professionals (8), former Obama aides (3) and miscellaneous (13)." https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2018/09/21/ciad-s21.html
This probably point to more wars to come. It is certainly a dangerous development for the peoples of the world. Not least in Europe and Russia.
As always, it is not the peoples who want war. Wars are created for money, as already Plato knew. But the problem is that Western peoples generally have no idea, that the Western governments have lied to them about the US wars since 1945. And unless they begin to realize this, there will be little resistance, if (before) the US and EU begin waging a real war with Russia and/or China.
NB. HELP SAVE MY CRITICAL INFORMATION
Before I will have to begin deleting some of it, because of the new Danish "Anti-NATO law, which can give up to 12 years imprisonment.
Please notice that the Danish government is working on a law proposal, which will make any NATO critical information problematic if not criminal. Peace researchers etc. will have to censor themselves to avoid the risk of jail. The law proposal says that you can get a 12 years imprisonment for sharing information, which 'You ought to have known, came from a foreign intel source.' Now, this is rather impossible to know in many cases. So, if Danes want to be sure not to risk jails, we have to censor ourselves to Western sources or similar. I think. This also applies to me. I will have to censor the content on my home page on all the former wars etc.
Please, help us preserve the knowledge and information that I have collected by making people copy my pages, before I reduce the content. Here is one of my most critical pages. On the US/CIA/Western 'Phoenix Program': https://homosociologicus.com/western-nations-back-terrorists
As a 'by the way' the Danish politicians recently decided that Danish national TV are not to have 'longer' explanations on their web site. Like the one above. But this is of course just a 'postmodern' inspiration.
This was a post on my Facebook the other day.
Yours
Lars Jorgensen
Lidt alvor om NATO og livet på Facebook (opdateret kl. 17.30)03-10-2018 09:26 "It never happened. Nothing ever happened. Even while it was happening it wasn’t happening. It didn’t matter. It was of no interest. The crimes of the United States have been systematic, constant, vicious, remorseless, but very few people have actually talked about them. You have to hand it to America. It has exercised a quite clinical manipulation of power worldwide while masquerading as a force for universal good. It’s a brilliant, even witty, highly successful act of hypnosis." -- Harold Pinter, Nobel Prize Speech 2005, link. T
"Pinter's words were more than surreal. The BBC ignored the speech of Britain's most famous dramatist", 'The invisible government', 2007, by John Pilger, linkIndledning.
NB. Dette handler ikke om mig. Dette handler om, at vores stat (og Facebook) arbejder målbevidst på at undertrykke afgørende kritisk viden om vores virkelighed - fra personer som mig, der i årevis har arbejdet dybt seriøst med at undersøge holdbar og uholdbar information om vores virkelighed og vores krige. Pierre Collignon's bog fra april indeholdt en tilsyneladende henkastet men reelt tung latterliggørelse af min person, bog. Bemærk iøvrigt her, at Syddansk Universitet har ladet en chefredaktør for Jyllandsposten bruge universitetets symbolske magt til at fortælle danskerne, hvad der er virkelighed. Senest har Facebook helt deaktiveret min konto (læs Steigan's korte artikel om baggrunden, her). Hvad bliver det næste? At google sletter min hjemmeside og mine artikler med en begrundelse om, at det handler om statens sikkerhed? Eller at jeg risikerer fængsel for at udforske vores virkelighed?
Om min rent samfundsfaglige brug af Facebook
Da jeg for fire-fem år siden besluttede mig for at bruge Facebook rent fagligt, forklarede jeg det til mine private venner og familie. Hvorefter jeg slettede dem alle på FB. Jeg ville adskille privatlivet fra mit samfundsvidenskabelige virke på Facebook.
I de forløbne år har jeg opbygget et netværk af kritisk tænkende mennesker, herunder en del af verdens vigtigste tænkere (professorer mv. der er på FB) omkring neoliberalismen, medieanalyse og vestens vanvittige, falske og ulovlige krige.
Uden at overdrive vil jeg sige, at jeg har lært mindst lige så meget om verden via mit Facebook universitet, som jeg gjorde gennem otte års intense sociologi-studier på universitetet. Se fx min artikel om vores mediers udlægninger af EU's behandling af Grækenland, her. Og om Syrien, her.
Jeg tager studier af faglitteratur og verden mere seriøst end de fleste. Jeg plejede at sige til min studerende, for at give dem en idé om min tilgang, at jeg engang brugte et halvt år på at forstå en af Bourdieus sætninger. Se eventuelt nogle af mine danske artikler om neoliberalismen her.
Men for at give læseren et lidt andet grundlag for at tænke, at jeg ikke er skør, så var jeg bagmand for udgivelsen af en økonomibog sidste år. En bog der viser, at alle tidens økonomiske dogmer er falske. Bogen blev udgivet af Politisk Revy (som udgiver Preben Wilhjelm mv.) og professor Jesper Jespersen var en vigtig støtte i projektet. Bogen blev introduceret på Københavns Universitet via CEVEA. Bogen bliver stærkt anbefalet af Mogens Lykketoft og James K. Galbraith mfl. Forfatteren Warren Mosler og jeg var desuden sammen med Lykketoft på den neokeynesianske konference i Aalborg i april 2017, link, hvor Lykketoft gav Mosler ret i hans analyse af den økonomiske virkelighed. Som PioPio anmelderen så korrekt skrev, så underminerer bogen komplet tidens neoliberale dogmer, således at "Nødvendighedens politik er aflyst", link. Det er ikke ligefrem overraskende, at Copenhagen Business School ansatte (foregangsfolk for de neoliberale magtrelationer og ideologi i Danmark) ikke kan se noget fornuftigt i bogen, link. Se min hjemmeside om Mosler og moderne pengeteori, her.
Dette blot for at gøre det lidt vanskeligt at affærdige min kritik af NATO og vestens narrativer, herunder sandsynliggøre at mit netværk og jeg ikke deler letfordøjelige 'Fake News', sådan som brugen af sociale medier ofte fremstilles i de etablerede medier og af tidens medslæbende akademikere.
Jeg har et omfattende netværk indenfor den vigtigste medieforskning, sociologi og den vigtigste økonomiske tænkning. Men vi er ikke mange skandinaviske akademikere, der går imod de vestlige narrativer om NATO's krige. Jeg kan dog nævne den kendte fredsforsker Jan Øberg, som også er en del af mit netværk, og som ikke har været brugt af de danske medier, siden han kom hjem fra Aleppo i Syrien for knap to år siden. Hvorfor? Givetvis fordi hans beretninger om virkeligheden i Syrien og i Aleppo underminerer alt, hvad vores journalister - til stadighed (sic!) - dagligt rapporterer om Syrien og Aleppo. Link til en af hans artikler, her. Besøg Øbergs FB side her, og se hvordan han dagligt punkterer de danske mediers information om forskellige lande og vestens krige. Senest har Øberg skrevet i en artikel i Arbejderen med denne kritik: " DIIS. Dansk Institut for Internationale Studier, har udsendt en publikation rettet mod gymnasieelever: "Trolde i dit feed – Russisk desinformation". Den kan bedst betegnes som intellektuelt bedrageri." Link
Jeg har forlængst erkendt, at de DIIS ansatte går CIA's ærinde. Ja, jeg er også forbundet med nogle af verdens vigtigste CIA-forskere. Dette gælder fx personer som Flemming Spliedsboel, der ikke bestiller andet end at bringe amerikanske løgne for den danske befolkning. Som Spliedsboel fx forklarer det her: "Seniorforsker: Russerne fucker med vores hjerner", link. Men Spliedsboel, din uhyrlige løgner og propagandist, det er ikke Rusland, der 'fucker med danskernes hjerne'. Det er dig. Læs om Rusland på min side her. Jeg kan ikke lige finde bogen, men jeg mener at have læst, at omtrent halvdelen af de norske ansatte på deres militærakademi var betalte af USA. Gad vide om USA betaler de ansatte på DIIS?
Jeg har lige talt med min fb ven den norske militærforsker Bård Wormdal om spørgsmålet om amerikansk betaling af norske analytikere mv. Bård forklarer følgende:
"Jeg skriver om USAs dekning av lønninger til den norske utenlands etterretningstjenesten i boka mi Spionbasen [link til en anmeldelse, her]. Jeg mener å huske at halvparten av de omlag 1000 ansatte var betalt av amerikanske prosjekter i 1970, offisielle opplysninger. Det er like mange i tjenesten i dag, ukjent andel amerikansk på amerikanske prosjekter." - Bård Wormdals Facebook væg, her
Men uanset hvem der betaler de danske DIIS-ansattes løn, så er det ikke den danske befolknings interesser i fred og sikkerhed, som de tjener. For deres propaganda mod Rusland kan være første fase mod endnu en storkrig mod Rusland (som WW2). Se denne kritik af den nyere norske 'forsvarspolitik': "Basepolitikk. Svekker norsk sikkerhet" fra en yderst erfaren og højt distingveret militærmand Børresen, som bla skriver: " Den norske baseerklæringen av 1. februar 1949, om at Norge ikke vil åpne fremmed baser så lenge landet ikke er angrepet eller truet med angrep, var et av hovedelementene i de selvpålagte begrensningene i norsk alliansepolitikk. Dette var tillitsskapende tiltak som skulle bidra til lavspenning i nord", link. Børresen skriver i øvrigt også om NATO's krig mod Libyen: "Målet var regimeskifte. Og dersom norske myndigheter faktisk forsto at det var regimeskifte det egentlig dreide seg om, er det grunnlag for å hevde at også de gjorde seg skyldig i et folkerettsbrudd." Link.
Se denne bog Oppgjør om hvordan den norske efterretningstjeneste arbejdede for ikke-demokratiske kræfter efter 2. verdenskrig, link, skrevet af den tidligere norske statssekretær, Oddmund H. Hammarstad. Den vigtige amerikanske professor McCoy skriver i sin seneste bog, at Washington Post havde en historie om, at USA i 2010 havde 854.000 'vetted agents', hvad det så end mere præcist skal betyde (muligvis denne artikel, link):
"In 2010, almost a decade into this secret war with its voracious appetite for information, the Washington Post reported that the national security state had swelled into a “fourth branch” of the federal government ― with 854,000 vetted officials, 263 security organizations, and over 3,000 intelligence units, issuing 50,000 special reports every year." ' Exploring The Shadows Of America’s Security State. How I learned not to love Big Brother', August, 2017. By Prof. Alfred W. McCoy
Det er amerikanerne, der 'fucker' med vores hjerner. Se min side om det enorme amerikansk styrede propaganda-apparat, link. Hvis læseren har vanskeligt ved at tro, at de magtfulde vestlige (især amerikanske) oligarker og de vestlige efterretningstjenester altid har været med til at styre vores medier, så kan man læse professor emeritus (Nobels forskningsakademi) Ola Tunanders forklaring om, at der aldrig var en russisk ubåd i Skærgården. Dengang Olof Palme blev nødt til at aflyse sit (tilnærmende) besøg hos Gorbachev. Link. Tunander har i øvrigt også lige skrevet en bog om, at krigen mod Libyen byggede på en løgn, link. Se min side om Libyen, her.
Se min ressource side om CIA's "Phoenix Program" der viser, at USA altid har brugt de proxi-terrorister, som Harold Pinter så uhyggeligt fortæller om i tilfældet Nicaragua, her. USA's brug af Al Qaeda, ISIS og Boko Haram bliver konsekvent dækket over af alle vestlige politikere, akademikere og journalister, der får plads til at tale i offentligheden.
Jeg har længe tænkt, at det kun ville være et spørgsmål om tid før Facebook ville censurere om ikke slette folk som mig. Idet vi dagligt deler information og viden, der komplet punkterer vores etablissementers uhyrligt falske 'narrativer' om vores neoliberale virkelighed, vores komplet falske medier (journalister) og om vores krige 'Bringing Democracy to the World'.
Det er på den baggrund, at jeg skabte min hjemmeside Homo Sociologicus: Dels for ikke at få slettet al den viden, som jeg er blevet uddannet i på FB, og dels for at give folk en chance for at få overblik over forskellige emner. Et bedre overblik end de daglige opslag på FB giver mulighed for.
Facebook har samme dagsorden som Forsvarets Efterretningstjeneste
De fleste har formentlig set, at vores medier og politikere i den seneste tid har arbejdet på at stigmatisere og nedgøre Facebook som et usikkert sted at være. Med store mediehistorier om at FB stjæler din private information osv. (Google er formentlig langt værre). Dette er ikke normal praksis for Big media Business. De vil faktisk altid gerne, at "du bliver lidt længere". Så hvorfor gør de det?
Jeg er overbevist om, at Facebook forsøger at skræmme folk væk fra Facebook. Netop fordi vi er så mange, der bruger FB til at blive klogere på verden. Dels ved at lytte til de akademikere, der ved noget om de forskellige lande og emner, som vores etablerede (Big Business kontrollerede) medier aldrig fortæller sandheden om; dels ved at forbinde os med mennesker, der er på jorden i Libyen, Brasilien, Kina, Rusland og Syrien mv., og som er langt mere troværdige end vores journalister, som vi rent faktisk ved viderebringer amerikanske løgne.
Se fx min Wittgensteinske 'one-and-a-half-truth' argumentation omkring Libyen, hvad vi i dag ved ud fra den britiske parlamentsrapport (2016), link. Det britiske parlament konkluderer, at al information om Libyen var falsk. Faktum er, at vi bombede for Al Qaeda osv. Min dybere sociologiske pointe er, at vi dermed også ved (for der var ingen modstridende information om Libyen), at praktisk talt alle vestlige journalister, akademikere og politikere delte de samme falske informationer i 2011. Bemærk her, at tidens akademiske bøger om 'Fake News' fx Vincent Hendricks og Pierre Collignon ikke nævner vores Libyen- 'fake news' med ét ord. Disse bøger er kriminelle, sådan som Aldous Huxley brugte udtrykket. Se (noget af) min tekst om problemet med vores kriminelle stat på Steigan: "Harold Pinters diagnose afslører den danske stat som falsk og farlig", link.
Med andre ord, Facebook er idag en trussel imod Big Business og vore neoliberale politikeres "skrøbelige narrativer", for at bruge Forsvarets Efterretningstjenestes udtryk: "Forsvarets Efterretningstjeneste (FE) har holdt dialogmøder med chefredaktører på nyhedsmedier og politikere om risikoen for, at det kommende folketingsvalg kan blive mål for cyberangreb.." Link. Meget sigende så var chefredaktøren for Dagbladet Arbejderen, som er den eneste danske avis, der forholder sig kritisk til NATO, ikke med til disse møder. Men det melder vores Big Business mediers historie her (naturligvis) ikke noget om.
En dansk "Garrison Stat" er under udvikling
Ja, mine linjer her er et wake-up call omkring det faktum, at såvel de politikere, som de danske universiteter og det danske militær i dag forsøger at kontrolle al vores information i medierner mv. Kun til gavn for USA's ulovlige og vanvittige krige. Det vil sige, kun til gavn for de vestlige oligarker, der kontrollerer alle den vestlige våbenindustri og langt mere end 90% af vestens 'corporate media'. Det er de samme magtfulde Big Business, der ejer såvel våben- som medieindustrien. Se fx denne information på Steigan, link.
Det er Big Business som styrer såvel vores medslæbende eller begejstrede (neoliberale) politikere, soldater og journalister. Derfor er det naturligvis kun løgn og hykleri, når en journalist som Rune Lykkeberg understreger, at han er 'uafhængig'. For som en RUC professor Ørsten forklarer det: "Hvis man modtager betaling, så opstår der et afhængighedsforhold. Så er man pr. definition ikke uafhængig." Sjovt nok så formår journalisten på Information ikke lige at tænke længere, end at lade Lykkeberg fremstå som så uafhængig som nyfalden sne (ift. at arbejde for politiske partier). Men samtidig undertrykkes ganske det faktum, at Lykkebergs arbejdsgiver Information, som de andre store aviser idag udelukkend støtter op om neoliberalismen, om NATO's ulovlige krige osv. Den problematik undertrykkes ganske effektivt ved hjælp af sådanne citater:
"Informations chefredaktør Rune Lykkeberg siger, at han ikke kan afvise, at han kunne finde på at stille op som ordstyrer eller vært for et politisk parti. Men i så fald ville han ikke tage imod penge for det, siger han. »Som chefredaktør synes jeg kun, jeg kan have én arbejdsgiver, og det er Information,« siger Rune Lykkeberg." Chefredaktør for den erklæret uafhængige netavis Pio fik honorarer af Socialdemokratiet, Information, link
Sandheden er, at Lykkeberg aldrig har delt én eneste kritisk sætning om NATO eller om mediernes afhængighed af Big Business. Det besynderlige, for nu at være diplomatisk, er blot, at også Clement og alle andre ansatte på DR komplet ukritisk deler de amerikanske 'narrativer' om virkeligheden. Da de faktisk bliver betalt for at være uafhængige formidlere for den danske befolkning. Lad Clement invitere mig i studiet...
I Pierre Bourdieus sidste bog Science of Science and Reflexivity advarer han om, at Big Business i samarbejde med militæret og de vestlige universiteter kan korrumpere såvel vestens videnskab som vores staters funktionsmåde. Det er ved at ske. Senest er den danske regering ved at forberede et lovforslag, som skal gøre det ulovligt at viderebringe kritik af NATO på Facebook, med en trussel om op til 12 års fængsel. Hvis det kan bevises, at det er sket i samarbejde med en fremmed nation. Nu deler jeg en hel del information fra russiske og syriske kilder, da de er de tætteste til at informere om de børn, civile og soldater, der rammes af NATOs bomber; herunder hvor NATOs specialstyrker opererer.
Jeg har familie og børn. Jeg har nærmest ikke tjent en krone de sidste par år, fordi jeg finder det mere vigtigt - end at tjene penge - at få oplyst folk om, hvor vanvittige og vanvittigt falske vores krige er. Jeg har ikke nogen anden dagsorden end at forstå vores virkelighed så objektivt som muligt. Skal det nu risikere at kunne koste folk som Øberg og jeg (og ansatte på Arbejderen) op til 12 år i fængsel?
Jeg kan formentlig ikke blive ved meget længere uden en klar opbakning fra det politiske system til, at vi har ytrings- og forskningsfrihed i Danmark. Jeg har, som sagt, familie og mindre børn.
Så jeg må spørge... Tror folk virkelig mere på Anders Samuelsen og tidligere chefredaktør på Jyllandsposten Pierre Collignon, end de tror på en Bourdieu-udlært sociolog, der har brugt tyve år på seriøst at forstå vores virkelighed? Og vil folk - og de andre politikere - virkelig tillade, at Anders Samuelsen (USA) skal skabe love, der gør kritik af NATO, herunder kritisk forskning som min dybt ulovlig?
Jeg har foreløbig lavet en ny konto på FB, så må vi se, om jeg kan få den oprindelige med mine mange fb venner og følgere aktiveret igen. Derfor har jeg kunnet se nedenstående (citerede) opdatering af Søren Wegner. Som tidligere nævnt, så har jeg ikke private venner på FB. Så jeg blev naturligvis glad, da jeg så denne post skrevet af en af mine FB venner omkring hans oplevelse af mit virke på Facebook.
Hvad en af mine (reelt ubekendte) FB venner skrev om mig
Søren Wegner skriver på Facebook den 30. september:
"Der høres somme tider bagkloge beklagelser over, at de intellektuelle og akademiske klasser aldrig åbner munden, når Overdanmark går i krig, designer nyhedsbilledet til egen fordel og giver sig selv øgede magtbeføjelser og asociale pengegaver, mens der skæres i samfundets fællesskabelige strukturer og i leve- og vidensgrundlaget for folk på gulvet.
Artiklen herunder ( Steigans artikel) er et kedeligt aktuelt exempel på, hvad der sker, når en af de få, der tør tale magthaverne midt imod, giver stemme til opklaringen af den massive historieforfalskning, mediemanipulation og åndelige korruption, vågne danskere er vidne til i disse år med 'aktivistisk udenrigspolitik', spindoktorerede 'får og bukke', 'rundkredspædagogik' og 'smagsdommere' samt Bilderberg-elitære ministre, der åbent erkender at være 'dronningens tjenere' snarere end folkets. De sovende masser reagerer ikke, men lader i god tro uvæsnet brede sig, indtil det også banker på deres dør, og da - mens søvnen endnu gnides ud af øjnene - er vægten for længst tippet. Som en overdopet hækkeløbers åbenlyse tyvstart, der ikke dømmes, og som endda har fået fjernet hækkene i sin bane forud for løbet. Samme udvikling kendes ikke blot fra det i sammenhængen klassiske exempel - det amerikansk finansierede Overtyskland i 1930'erne - men overalt, hvor USA har gjort sin udenrigspolitiske indflydelse gældende både før og ikke mindst siden. I de mange lande, hvor oppositionen til fascismen og imperialismen har ordentlig fat, bruger USA ikke fløjlshandsker. Kun i lydstater som Danmark, hvor politikere, medier og skoler i generationer har deltaget i hjernevasken, sker udviklingen uden, at de brede masser opdager det, før det er for sent. Åbenlys censur, som den der nu er blevet sociologen Lars Jørgensen til del på Facebook, er tegn på, at oppositionen for alvor er begyndt at vågne og røre på sig også i alliancens væbnerlande. Den mere subtile censur har existeret længe, fx. på Googles søgemaskine, når særlige narrativer ganske enkelt udelukkes fra 'det gode selskab' eller altid har følgeskab i medierne af en eller flere svært mistænkeliggørende højtalere for den officielle version af 'sandheden', som magthaverne portrætterer den. Dansk fjernsyn kunne aldrig drømme om også at give samme enetaletid, som de dagligt giver til Overdanmarks 'krigsaktivister', til fredsaktivister som Lars Jørgensen, Pernille Grumme eller Jan Øberg. Risikoen for, at 'den nationale sikkerhed' (læs: det etablerede hierarki) sættes over styr, når Christiansborg ikke længere har den narrative tete i medierne, er alt for stor. Her er, hvad jeg ved en tidligere lejlighed skrev om Lars Jørgensens virke:
"En af de danske mimersbrønde og kilder til inspiration, jeg - på trods af (eller i mit særlige tilfælde måske snarere på grund af) sine konsekvent provokerende, mytedræbende vinkler på kontroverselle emner - finder størst tryghed ved at læse mig klogere ved, er sociologen Lars Jørgensen og hans database Homo Sociologicus. Der er altid kant og ofte disput, når Lars Jørgensen går i kødet på et emne, og ikke så få skarpe hjerner fra et (fornemmer jeg) bredt, internationalt udsnit af baggrunde bidrager støt med inputs, vinkler og viden, der vægter for og imod og giver stof til eftertanke. En klar anbefaling herfra..."
Jeg kan ikke huske nogensinde at have set en kontroversiel udmelding på Lars Jørgensens faktakoncentrerede Facebook-profil, som ikke har fået kontante, intellektuelle med- og modspil i bedste demokratiske samtaleånd. Hvis der på Lars Jørgensens profil overhovedet gives plads til falske nyheder, så får de i oplysningens ånd og navn hurtigt kam til parykken.
Derfor skal der lyde nok en klar anbefaling herfra, men denne gang rettet mod Facebooks censurdommere: giv Lars Jørgensen sin stemme og platform tilbage! Uden ham står kolportørerne af falske nyheder kun stærkere.
Mvgrrr..."
Want a better world? Join Facebook :)13-09-2018 17:14 First I'll tell you why Facebook has made a historical breakthrough as to inform people about the CIA lies, which cover up the US-led wars on the world. Then I'll tell you why MMT (modern monetary theory) is the most important intellectual tool to break the ideological chains of the neoliberal ideology in politics and in the economic profession.
Thank you Facebook! Or, why FB tries to make people leave
We ARE winning :) It is a historical fact that Facebook and other social media have made people more aware of their media's lies and propaganda and about the dirty reality of CIA and the US terror-funded warfare - than they have ever been before. Moreover, there is no way going back. CIA and the Western establishments can never make all the informed people as ignorant as they were before. We know, what we know.
What's the historical difference? Today we KNOW what the CIA, MI6 and our media do. Before the social media many 'knew' about it and suspected much of it. But now we KNOW. This makes us informed people a real historic threat. And this explains why CIA/Suckerberg are in panic; why they WARN people about Facebook (via our media and politicians): "don't use FB; we monitor you and use your info etc."
Sure, CIA, Facebook corporate owners are worried about our info being used by them. Makes for pure nonsense 🤣
I would never have known anything, of what I know today, about the CIA, MI6, our media and the Western etablissments' lies etc. without my extremely knowledgeable FB network and all the independent sources from around the world. My Facebook University as I usually calls it. Foremost learning from Luciana Bohne, Doug Valentine, Mark Crispin Miller, Jacques Pauwels, Margaret Kimberley, Tim Anderson, Vanessa Beeley, Pål Steigan, Michael Jabara Carley and many more.
If you would like to see a condenced version of the fact that the US has lied and the Western establishments cover up for their lies since 1945, I suggest that you watch Harold Pinter's Nobel Prize Lecture from 2005. BBC did not bring it. But here Pinter confirms everything that we can learn from the critical literature on US wars, CIA's dirty way of always using terrorist proxies and have quislings from the targeted nations betray their own country. Take Syria for instance, practically all Syrian presented in the Western media the past seven years are anti-Assad, while 90% or more of the Syrian population are behind Assad in reality. Pinter's words support all my nation pages, where it can be seen how the US undermines and destroys democratic rule for the people, so that the corporate masters of our universe can put in dictators that will let our cynical oligarchs plunder the peoples' resources. I learned more about our deeply corrupted (structured) reality in my FB university than in my eight years of dedicated university studies in sociology. But... I was also very lucky to get probably the best FB network in the world. Look at Luciana Bohne's writings on Counterpunch; Mark Crispin Miller books on US politics and media propaganda; Jacques Pauwels' history books; Vanessa Beeley and Tim Anderson on Syria vs. Western propaganda; the international lawyer Christopher C. Black; the British university rektor and ambassador (who witnessed CIA torture in Uzbekistan), going whistleblower Craig Murray and last but absolutely not least Doug Valentine's CIA research. Finally, I should not forget to mention the support from many of my friends there, not least my most precious Heather Cottin (widow after the amazing Sean Gervasi, JFK advisor and much more). But of course I have also learned so much from many, many other incredibly knowledgeable FB friends and other people on FB. There is simply no way, I (we) could have made such a radical truth seeking network, if we had not had Facebook. All this learning inspired me to make my home page HomoSociologicus.com, where I have shared as much as I have been able to - working more than ten hours daily the past few years with practically no income. Because... I find it important that other people should know reality. I love people and I have children. We are destroying our civilization at the moment.
You know, the only two persons I have seen saying exactly this (about destroying our civilisation) are the great French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu in a speech to French strikers in the nineties and Warren Mosler a few years ago.
MMT can save us and make our future bright
Next we come to my most positive learning experience via Facebook, which was learning about MMT 'modern monetary theory'. It complete blew my mind! Like nothing I have ever learnt before. I went from pessimist to optimist about our future in a few days as I realized the implications of MMT. At that time I have been studying Pierre Bourdieu's sociology for twenty years, so it was incredible to learn that MMT had the most powerful answer as to how ce can take back the control of our economy and finances and make decent societies for our children.
I am convinced that Warren Mosler has given the Western world the most important economic intellectual tools to liberate us from neoliberalism. So, I was instrumental in having his book The Seven Deadly Innocent Frauds of Economic Policy translated to Danish. And it was the most intellectually stimulating days of my life, when I was travelling with Warren in Denmark to three universities to tell the economic students that eveything that they have taught in the Western economic profession the past forty years was false. I consider Warren Mosler a genius comparable to almost no other scientists in the world today. Pierre Bourdieu is the only one I can think of with such a sharp intellect. I often say that economic history will be written (in the future): Marx, Keynes, Mosler.
We will see. It depends on our collective actions. But you should certainly realize that the corporate powers will do anything to cheer up your feeling of powerlessness and despair. Don't listen. The Syrian narrative is falling apart within the Western states - as I write these lines. And if more engaged in this, it could really make a historial media scandal. People are realizing more and more about our reality every day. And your spreading the words will make a difference. As to MMT, we have hundreds of thousands of engaged people, so it's just a matter of jumping in, learn and spread the word: all governments with their own currency have the money they want for welfare, infrastructure, education, culture etc. At the moment people only learn that Western states by necessity only have the money they want for the private banks and the military. Didn't you suspect a heavy logical problem in this? Your despair is a product of their lies: we've never been richer or more productive. And robots? They'll only add to our collective richness. As Mosler explained in Denmark, robots are nothing new. Machines were introduced into agriculture and set 95% of the workers free to produce all the things, which add to people's welfare. The basic problem today is about sharing the richness. Another acute problem which MMT explain to us, is, that our neoliberal governments have taken way to much money out of our economies, so that people can hardly live, much less invest and buy enough to keep everybody happy with a job and the prospect of a future for their children. It really is easy. Learn MMT and get rid of our neoliberal establishment lackeys. It will be necessary for many of us to join politics. We can't leave Corbyn alone with the job - and Corbyn doesn't even know MMT. Much less his advisors!! I am for honesty. So I am not done with Mosler yet. You should know that he is very rich, but that he went to Denmark on his own expences and spent a little week here only to give the Danish people the opportunity to take MMT seriously as a way to liberate Danish political from neoliberal dogmas (of course the economic profession generally boycotted listening to him here). At the moment he is trying to enter politics, not to become famous, but to help the people, where he lives (Virgin Islands). Mosler is the man who taught the professors around the world how money and finance work. Even though they most often don't mention him and many probably don't even though that he came with the ideas to understand how our economic fiat money reality works. Mosler taught the most important economist Bill Mitchell, who paid attention from the beginning and in 2017 Mitchell and Thomas Fazi, published the most important book on how neoliberalism got away with taking over European politics and how to win back our national politics for the people. Also don't miss Fazi's and Mitchell's other books! Learn MMT on my resource page on MMT here. Listen to Mosler and Mitchell in their videos a bit down. You might like to begin with Mitchell's intro to MMT: https://homosociologicus.com/neoliberalism-3My page with some of the most important sociology texts on the neoliberal conspiracy: https://homosociologicus.com/great-texts---neoliberalismNB. there are many very important MMT groups on Facebook I have a page called MMT Scandinavia. But don't settle with that one ;) Here is my page get out of the corporate cave on CIA's Phoenix program: https://homosociologicus.com/western-nations-back-terroristsHere is my page on the true history of WW2 and after, where the US hired all the worst nazis, who entered the US intel agencies and went on contributing to the US nazi-like nation destructions, we have seen since around the world. We need to stop this insane corporate machine: https://homosociologicus.com/history-of-20-21-century Getting this history right is crucial to fight the (same) corporate powers today, which were behind Hitler. Here are two quotes from the page;
'The US prosecution during the Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunals made clear that neither the rise of the Nazis, nor WWII nor the holocaust would have been possible without the financial and logistical support of IG Farben. Today, more than six decades since the end of WWII, mankind has yet to solve one of the greatest riddles: How come that none of the international organizations that set out to preserve the memory of this war and the holocaust has not pointed their fingers at these historic facts?' Profit over Life
'After 60 years where students and teachers alike have been deprived of any information about the corporate background of WWII, it is time that the textbooks of history, as well as political and social sciences, are re-written.' Introduction for schools and colleges: Without IG Farben, WWII would not have been possible!, Profit over Life
But you will find many, many more interesting pages on my site. Pls like it, if you do.
Thanks dear FB friends. It is and it has been a pure privilege.
Yours
Lars Neoliberalism or Populism: What's The Problem?13-06-2018 12:02 First the neoliberal masters kill the peoples, then they blame them.
It is a rather cunning strategy that the neoliberal masters of the universe implement these decades: first they infiltrate all the Western political ‘left’, ‘middle’ and ‘labour’ parties with neoliberal ideology. Bill Clinton was most influential in this, with his election strategy of ‘Third Way’ politics and his motto ‘To end welfare as we know it’. Then Tony Blair (with the help of UK sociologist Anthony Giddens) further rationalized and made the strategy explicit with his ‘Third Way’. This was picked up by German social democrat Schröder, who won the leadership in Germany. It was even picked up by the Danish right wing ‘liberal’ party leader (the well known liar for Bush on Iraq and later NATO secretary) Anders Fogh Rasmussen. The ‘success’ of the Third Way made most politicians into ‘blairites’ no matter what country, we are talking about. And most countries have done nothing but neoliberal ‘reforms’ for decades now – AGAINST the people.
Next, as the people are being suppressed, arrogantly dismissed and made still poorer with still less welfare etc., what can the people do? Now, in this neoliberal atmosphere there are almost only ‘sane’ alternative political messages appealing to the people’s interests on the right wing. You know, critiques of the EU, messages that we cannot afford welfare because of all the immigrants and refugees etc. So, as many people realize that there is absolutely for sure no good future with the neoliberal parties, they put in their two pence and their vote for Brexit, Trump, populists in Italy etc.
The right wing and populist solutions are not always exactly true, to say the least. But the peoples' choices here are very understandable from a sociological point of view. Especially when you add that the peoples have received nothing true and objective information about the neoliberal political development, and about what causes it and how the neoliberal politicians have betrayed them for decades. The people have received nothing but neoliberal lies and propaganda to make them accept their own suppression.
And this, of course, does not stop now. So, instead of trying to understand the people and make sense of the political movement, as people move to the right and vote for 'populist' parties, the people are once more dismissed, suppressed and lied both to and about.
Today all the neoliberal establishments with all their well clothed politicians and fine words speaking academics in all the national and corporate controlled media go on and on shaming the people, as the people protest against the no-mercy neoliberal killing and suppression.
What are the establishments saying? They say that the people are becoming 'populistic' as they listen to non-establishment politicians; and that the people are becoming stupid and are misled as they listen to non-establishment information.
In short, the very well crafted rationalized message that the corporate masters of the universe and all their 'mitmachen' academic and journalistic lackeys want the world to absorb is that 'populism', 'non-establishment information' and 'the peoples' are the biggest problems today.
Who are we and what is the meaning of neoliberalism?
"The movement toward the neoliberal utopia of a pure and perfect market is made possible by the politics of financial deregulation. (..) .. the nation, whose space to manoeuvre continually decreases. In this way, a Darwinian world emerges - it is the struggle of all against all at all levels of the hierarchy, which finds support through everyone clinging to their job and organisation under conditions of insecurity, suffering, and stress." - Pierre Bourdieu, The Essence of Neoliberalism, 1998, Le Monde Diplomatique
"The state nobility, which preaches the withering away of the state and the undivided reign of the market and the consumer, the commercial substitute for the citizen, has kidnapped the state: it has made the public good a private good, has made the 'public thing', res publica, the Republic, its own thing. (..) The national states are undermined from outside by these financial forces, and they are undermined from inside by those who act as the accomplices of these financial forces, in other words, the financiers, bankers and finance ministry officials. I think that the dominated groups in society have an interest in defending the state, particularly in its social aspect." - Pierre Bourdieu, Acts of Resistance, 'Against the Destruction of a Civilization', 1998: 25
"One might say that in the headquarters of the corporations, whose collective interest is clearly reflected in American government policies, nostalgia has lingered on for the good old days of Hitler’s Third Reich, which was a paradise for German as well as American and other foreign firms: no left-wing parties, no unions, unlimited numbers of slave labourers, and an authoritarian state that provided the necessary discipline and arranged for an “armament boom” and eventually a war that brought “horizonless profits..." -Jacques Pauwels, Author Big Business and Hitler
"The invasion of Iraq was a bandit act, an act of blatant state terrorism, demonstrating absolute contempt for the concept of international law. The invasion was an arbitrary military action inspired by a series of lies upon lies and gross manipulation of the media and therefore of the public; an act intended to consolidate American military and economic control of the Middle East masquerading - as a last resort - all other justifications having failed to justify themselves - as liberation. A formidable assertion of military force responsible for the death and mutilation of thousands and thousands of innocent people.
We have brought torture, cluster bombs, depleted uranium, innumerable acts of random murder, misery, degradation and death to the Iraqi people and call it 'bringing freedom and democracy to the Middle East'.
How many people do you have to kill before you qualify to be described as a mass murderer and a war criminal? One hundred thousand? More than enough, I would have thought. Therefore it is just that Bush and Blair be arraigned before the International Criminal Court of Justice. But Bush has been clever. He has not ratified the International Criminal Court of Justice. Therefore if any American soldier or for that matter politician finds himself in the dock Bush has warned that he will send in the marines. But Tony Blair has ratified the Court and is therefore available for prosecution. We can let the Court have his address if they're interested. It is Number 10, Downing Street, London. (...)
The United States now occupies 702 military installations throughout the world in 132 countries, with the honourable exception of Sweden, of course. We don't quite know how they got there but they are there all right.
The United States possesses 8,000 active and operational nuclear warheads. Two thousand are on hair trigger alert, ready to be launched with 15 minutes warning. It is developing new systems of nuclear force, known as bunker busters. The British, ever cooperative, are intending to replace their own nuclear missile, Trident. Who, I wonder, are they aiming at? Osama bin Laden? You? Me? Joe Dokes? China? Paris? Who knows? What we do know is that this infantile insanity - the possession and threatened use of nuclear weapons - is at the heart of present American political philosophy. We must remind ourselves that the United States is on a permanent military footing and shows no sign of relaxing it.
Many thousands, if not millions, of people in the United States itself are demonstrably sickened, shamed and angered by their government's actions, but as things stand they are not a coherent political force - yet. But the anxiety, uncertainty and fear which we can see growing daily in the United States is unlikely to diminish. (...)
When we look into a mirror we think the image that confronts us is accurate. But move a millimetre and the image changes. We are actually looking at a never-ending range of reflections. But sometimes a writer has to smash the mirror - for it is on the other side of that mirror that the truth stares at us. I believe that despite the enormous odds which exist, unflinching, unswerving, fierce intellectual determination, as citizens, to define the real truth of our lives and our societies is a crucial obligation which devolves upon us all. It is in fact mandatory. If such a determination is not embodied in our political vision we have no hope of restoring what is so nearly lost to us - the dignity of man." - Harold Pinter, 2005, Nobel Prize Lecture
Resistance: What to know and think?
"We are destroying our civilization because of a wrong economic thinking." - Warren Mosler
"95% of all declared 'progressives' are effectively operating in a neoliberal space." - Bill Mitchell
People should not believe any of the establishments' lies about economics, welfare or our wars for one more second. No matter how polite the words and how well dressed the establishment speakers may seem. Instead, people need to stick to the true intellectuals, who can show the true colours of our establishment people, as they are all nothing but ignorant and heartless neoliberal thugs dressed up as nice people.
We need to organize outside the established political parties or revolutionize them from the inside, if we are to destroy the neoliberal power grip. First step is to see the neoliberal plan and suppression for what it is: a plan to destroy our civilization as we know it. To destroy all Western civil, welfare and workers' rights and all realistic hope for a decent future for the peoples' children.
In short, we need to do away with our neoliberal establishments before they do away with us and the rest of the peoples of the world. This requires the spread of intellectual resources and knowledge. People need to know reality to be able to act most sensible.
People need to know about Pierre Bourdieu, Harold Pinter and Warren Mosler, who have the absolutely most crucial analyses of our social reality. Moreover, they agree on the diagnosis, namely that the US and the Western corporate masters are on their way to destroy our civilization. Of course, our establishments work to suppress the brilliant insights of all three. So, chances are that you don't even know about their analyses.
People may regard my blog post here to be both 'populistic' and 'alternative information'. So, I urge you to learn the stuff below, for yours and mine children and for their children:
Watch (and read the transcript) Harold Pinter's Nobel Prize Lecture explaining how it has been possible to make the Western people accept the past seventy years of US wars made upon lies and propaganda; as he explains that the Western establishments have always - consciously and unconsciously - supported and even defended the US lies and propaganda (the BBC did not air it): Harold Pinter - Nobel Lecture Art, Truth & Politics, 2005
People need to realize that the Western corporate power elites and their hired and mitmachen establishments, the media, the academics and the politicians generally bring them nothing true and good. These are not empty words, as the Western establishments are working on ways to ridicule, suppress and censor alternative information such as mine here as 'fake news'.
Please read and share this information everywhere
Yours sincerely
Lars Jorgensen, sociologist, Denmark 9/11 Beginners 101 - January 201825-01-2018 13:18 Terrorism has replaced Communism as the rationale for the militarization of America, for military adventures abroad, and for the suppression of civil liberties at home. It serves the same purpose, serving to create hysteria.” -- Howard Zinn
"Whoever is responsible for bringing to grisly fruition this new false-flag operation, which has been used to justify the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq as well as unprecedented assaults on research, education, and civil liberties, must be perversely proud of their efficient handiwork. -- Lynn Margulis
"Even though Dr. Lynn Margulis was best known for her breakthroughs in science, perhaps her greatest contribution was her public support for a real 9/11 investigation." Dr. David Ray Griffin
#Tower7Explosions #WittnessessAndExperts (die) #NISTLied #AssangeNotInterested
Physics and Insurance Companies don't buy the Official Version
"Given the fact that before September 11, 2001 no high-rise steel-frame building has ever collapsed from fire alone (Taylor, 2011), extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. The NIST Reports did not address the total collapse of the Twin Towers, truncating their study at “collapse initiation.” Overall, our peer-reviewed literature results collectively yield a very strong prima facie argument for controlled demolition."
"If it is true that steel-frame buildings can collapse from fire alone, it is crucial for owners of existing structures and insurers to understand the risk of a sudden fire-induced collapse so that structural repairs and risk adjustments can be factored in. Given the official story, it is remarkable how little insurance premiums, or even design parameters and building construction codes, have been modified (if at all) to address the possibility of catastrophic fire-induced progressive collapse. The fact that they have not been modified indicates that insurance companies do not accept the PC hypothesis."
Demolition Experts knew from day one it was controlled demolitions
You want to listen and know this: "Tom Sullivan - Former Explosives Loader for Controlled Demolition, Inc. (CDI) [World's leading demolition company] Tom discusses the complex process of preparing a building for controlled demolition and sites the reasons why WTC building 7 had to have been a controlled demolition." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5IgqJXyLbg
As certain was this expert: "Danny Jowenko was a Dutch expert in controlled demolition who testified that WTC7 collapse ould only be due to controlled demolition." Wikispooks
12.000 Pages Testimony about 'Explosions' on 9/11 - suppressed
The Official NIST Report Lied (one example)
Professor in Religion Studies, David Ray Griffin writes:
"NIST’s timeline is also directly contradicted by the testimony of Jennings, who said: “After getting to the 8th floor everything was dark . . . . [B]oth buildings were still standing. Because I looked . . . one way, looked the other way. . . . [B]oth buildings were still standing.”8
The strongest evidence against NIST’s timeline, however, is Hess’s interview with UPN 9 News. Defenders of the official account, according to which there were no explosions in WTC 7, might challenge the truth of Jennings’s testimony. But if Hess was giving an interview almost a half mile away before noon, then NIST’s timeline, according to which the two men were not rescued until after noon, is objectively disproved. This is the case whether we accept the 11:34 or the 11:57 starting time for this interview.
Given the fact that the interview occurred almost a half mile from the WTC, it would probably have taken Hess at least a half hour to get there after he was rescued (he surely would have talked to firefighters and other officials about the ordeal before taking off). So if the interview began at 11:34, he and Jennings would have been rescued before 11:05. If the interview began at 11:57, they would have been rescued before 11:30." http://911truth.org/nist-lied-barry-jennings-michael-hess-…/
Barry Jennings' Important Testimony on WT7 - Two Interviews
Barry Jennings was not interviewed for the NIST investigations until a few YEARS after 9/11. He was later threatened and tried to retract his testimonies. Then, finally he died(was killed under mysterious circumstances a couple of days before the NIST report was published.
"Barry Jennings was an important eyewitness to the events of 9/11. At the time, he was the Deputy Director of the Emergency Services Department for the New York City Housing Authority. Together with Michael Hess, the New York City Corporation Counsel (an associate of Rudy Giuliani), he was rescued from WTC Building 7 before it collapsed at 5:20 p.m. On several occasions, Jennings stated that an explosion trapped them in WTC Building 7 (before the collapses of WTC 1 & 2) and that explosions occurred throughout the building until they were saved after attracting the attention of a team of firefighters through a broken 8th floor window. Jennings reportedly died in 2008, in highly suspicious circumstances." Wikispooks (a site made becauce we cannot trust Wikipedia - just check what the two sites writes about Jennings, for example)
Assange not interested in 9/11, nor 'Explosions', nor Jennings
"I spoke to Assange at the National Press Club in DC when he presented the video he got from Chelsea Manning. I asked him to look into JenningsMystery.com - He refused.
Jennings story is such an amazing indictment of corporate media: Summary of Case
On August 19, 2008, 53 year old Barry Jennings died, two days before the release of the NIST Final Report on the collapse of WTC7. Jennings was Deputy Director of Emergency Services Department for the New York City Housing Authority. On September 11th, 2001, he saw and heard explosions BEFORE the Twin Towers fell, while attempting to evacuate the WTC 7 Command Center with NYC Corporation Counsel Michael Hess. Jennings publicly shared his experiences with a reporter on the day of 9/11/01, as well as in a lengthy 2007 video interview with Dylan Avery, a small clip of which was then released; subsequently his job was threatened and he asked that the taped interview not be included in Loose Change Final Cut..
However, after an interview with Jennings was broadcast by the BBC in their program The Third Tower ostensibly refuting what he had previously stated to Avery, Avery felt compelled to release the full original video interview to show the distortions made by the BBC. The cause of Jennings' death has not been made public, and a private investigator hired by Avery to discover the cause and circumstances surrounding his death refused to proceed with the investigation. In spite of the significance of Jennings' position with NYC on 9/11 and his controversial eyewitness testimony regarding the collapse of WTC7, the media has not investigated or reported on his death, nor reported on his statements." https://www.quora.com/What-9-11-secrets-were-revealed-by-WikiLeaksThe JenningsMystery: "He worked for the City of New York. He was Deputy Director of the Emergency Services Department. He was in WTC Building 7 on 9/11, and he saw too much." http://jenningsmystery.com/Much more 9/11: HS page on the subject http://homosociologicus.com/the-crime-of-911
Prism: Charles Wright Mills Review of 'Behemoth' (1942)19-12-2017 10:14 Franz Neumann's analysis of the German nazi society Behemoth 1933-1944 is no doubt one of the most advanced prisms to help us understand our neoliberal situation today.
Once more everything seems to be or is actually turned on its head. And our public 'intellectuals' cover up truth instead of telling it. In the public we only have 'intellectuals' working for the neoliberal war-locomotive. In short, we have "Behemoth" once more:
"the Nazi organization of society involved the collapse of traditional ideas of the state, of ideology, of law, and even of any underlying rationality."
“Hardly any other ideological element is held in such profound contempt in our civilization as international law. Every generation has seen it break down as an instrument for organizing peace, and a theory that disposes of its universalist claims has the obvious advantage of appearing to be realistic. The fallacy should be equally obvious, however. To abandon universalism because of its failures is like rejecting civil rights because they help legitimize and veil class exploitation, or democracy because it conceals boss control, or Christianity because churches have corrupted Christian morals. Faced with a corrupt administration of justice, the reasonable person does not demand a return to the war of each against all, but fights for an honest system. Likewise, when we have shown that international law has been misused for imperialistic aims, our task has begun, not ended. We must fight against imperialism.” —Franz Neumann, Behemoth: The Structure and Practice of National Socialism 1933-1944
Excerpts from Charles Wright Mills' review of Behemoth below (1942):
"The analysis of Behemoth casts light upon capitalism in democracies. To the most important task of political analysis Neumann has contributed: if you read his book thoroughly, you see the harsh outlines of possible futures close around you. With leftwing thought confused and split and dribbling trivialities, he locates the enemy with a 500 watt glare. And Nazi is only one of his names."
"One of the generic errors of those who do not see the German economy as capitalistic is Marx’s view that capitalism is an anarchy of production. Of course, as Max Weber contended, modern Western capitalism is nothing of the sort. It is rationalized and planned. The more monopolization continues, the more capitalism is controlled and planned."
"These are the rulers and the rest are the ruled, but these form at times an uneasy front, and the ruled may well be watching carefully. From these four angles, interests, anchored in the entire social structure but especially in violence and production, coalesce into the central aim: continual preparation and maintenance of imperialist war. To grasp this clearly is to see the structure of the regime as a total thing, called Behemoth.
War gives National Socialism not only glory but a stabilization of its power; to industry it gives profits, conquers foreign markets and accumulates booty capital. Neumann sees the bureaucracy, relatively unchanged by the Nazi conquest of power, marching with the victorious."
"Ideologies and social structure are seen conjointly, which is the only way to see either in accurate and telling focus. For in some situations nothing that is said can be taken at its face value, and it is more important to know meanings than to test for truth. Indeed, the way to political reality is through ideological analysis. This is the way that Neumann has taken, and this is why his account of Nazi ideology is at times definitive and always interesting. His account of the blending of geopolitics and international law to form a “Germanic Monroe Doctrine” is a model for such analysis."
"Ideas are political cloaks. The ideology of Gemeinschaft, e.g., masks the impersonality of a rationalized society."
"...anti-Semitism operates as a surrogate for class struggle by heaping hatred upon one “enemy”; in the same act it seeks to “unify” the Aryan community. The manner in which Nazi doctrine is shaped by the need to ensnare various strata is neatly illustrated by its inclusion of perverted Marxist elements."
"In a similar contradiction Neumann shows that as the political power of the state has increased, the doctrine of the totalitarian state has been rejected by Nazi intellectuals."
"Not only does acceptance or rejection of Neumann’s analysis set the type of understanding we have of Germany, it sets our attitude toward given elements in other countries, sights the act of our allegiance, places limits upon our political aspirations: helps us locate the enemy all over the world. That is why Franz Neumann’s book is not only the most important to appear about Germany; it is a live contribution to all leftwing thinking today. His book will move all of us into deper levels of analysis and stragegy. It had better. Behemoth is everywhere united."
Comparing Nazi & Neoliberal Reality12-12-2017 16:41 Book excerpts from Nazi Era to Enlighten today's Neoliberalism
The People As Enemy: The Leaders' Hidden Agenda in World War II, 2013, J Spritzler:
"There is the official view of World War II—the one we have all been taught—then, there is the one presented here: very different, and very disturbing. This alternative view argues that the aims of the national leaders were not democracy and self-determination, but were, as wars generally are, opportunities to suppress class rebellion. Furthermore, Spritzler maintains, the myths of World War II are the same myths that are being used today in the "war against terrorism" by government and corporate leaders to control people and pursue ends that have nothing to do with protecting us from terrorism."
They Thought They Were Free: The Germans, 1933-45, M. Mayer [excerpt]
“What happened here [Germany then] was the gradual habituation of the people, little by little, to being governed by surprise; to receiving decisions deliberated in secret; to believing that the situation was so complicated that the government had to act on information which the people could not understand, or so dangerous that, even if the people could not understand it, it could not be released because of national security. And their sense of identification with Hitler, their trust in him, made it easier to widen this gap and reassured those who would otherwise have worried about it.”--from Chapter 13, “But Then It Was Too Late”. Amazon
Behemoth: Structure and Practice of National Socialism, 1933-1944
"Neumann was one of the only early Frankfurt School thinkers to examine seriously the problem of political institutions.() the Nazi organization of society involved the collapse of traditional ideas of the state, of ideology, of law, and even of any underlying rationality."
War Against the Weak: Eugenics and America's Campaign to Create a Master Race, 2012, E Black:
"War Against the Weak is the gripping chronicle documenting how American corporate philanthropies launched a national campaign of ethnic cleansing in the United States, helped found and fund the Nazi eugenics of Hitler and Mengele — and then created the modern movement of "human genetics." Some 60,000 Americans were sterilized under laws in 27 states."
A One-And-A-Half-Truth for Pinter and Pilger10-12-2017 22:39 "...across the world the extinction and suffering of countless human beings could be attributed to rampant American power. "But," said Pinter, "You wouldn't know it. It never happened. Nothing ever happened. Even while it was happening it wasn't happening. It didn't matter. It was of no interest." Pinter's words were more than surreal. The BBC ignored the speech of Britain's most famous dramatist." - John Pilger
“BBC, in short, ensured that the British and other peoples did not know about the most crucially important speech about the Western states' war crimes since 1945 (see the list on left bottom). In Pinter's own words: "You wouldn't know it. It never happened. Nothing ever happened. Even while it was happening it wasn't happening. It didn't matter. It was of no interest." - Homo Sociologicus
The Sociological Question: which sociological mechanisms may explain Pinter's observation on the Western states' neglience of its consecutive state war crimes on a Nuremberg scale. From Korea & Vietnam to Yugoslavia, Libya & Syria etc.?
The Answer: corporate power relations control the Western political systems to a still larger extent. Not least on ‘foreign policy’. The states' intel agencies are generally corporate tools. They control the most important media, while hired academics at the universities and especially 'think tanks' write the demanded 'non-fiction' & 'analysis reports' to tell the media and the academic world, what to think. Basically, all (the rest) Western academics take the propaganda 'non-fiction' literature and 'analyses' seriously as if it had any resemblance to truth, while the media simply use and peddle the ‘well-established’ information as if it was sincerely researched information. You will probably only have to watch this one minute video expose of the US 17 'intel agencies' to see a vital glimpse of the the truth and have your trust in the official sourced changed radically. But you wouldn't know, it never happened etc., if you trust the BBC and other (state or corporate) Establishment media.
It is important to realize the incredible size of the US' so-called 'security complex': "In 2010 (..) Washington Post reported that the national security state had swelled into a “fourth branch” of the federal government ― with 854,000 vetted officials, 263 security organizations, and over 3,000 intelligence units, issuing 50,000 special reports every year." Exploring the Shadows of the US Security State: How I Learned Not to Love Big Brother, August 24, 2017, By Alfred McCoy
Bill Clinton de-regulated the US media laws in the 1990ties thereby opening up for almost total corporate media control. Today six companies owe the right to tell 90% of all American media employees, what to tell the people and how. The European politicians, academics and journalists simply have to accept the information given to submise and enlargen the US (deep) state's control to Europe. This, they do. The added corporate control of the media also helped change the political development even further to the right. This has also made it easy for both national state and corporate media to more systematically employ right wing sympathetic journalists, who will not pose critical questions but will applaud the corporate sources and its neoliberal scripts for ideological reasons. In Denmark, for instance, we often see former right wing spin doctors portray as political analysts on national tv. And the once most trusted program is today also regularly hosted by a former right wing spindoctor.
The late German editor of the Frankfurter Allegemeiner Zeitung, Udo Ulfkotte, published a book a few years ago, where he confessed to twenty five years of working for the CIA telling stories they wanted or gave him. Again, this should come as no surprise if you know even a bit about the CIA's history of infiltration in Western states. But of course, you wouldn't know it... The CIA and MI6 and other 'intel agencies' influence all over the media to have their (corporate masters') agendas represented as they want. The former US war hero and Pentagon employee Richard Ford has stated that the 'Syrian Laboratory for Human Rights', you know, the man in Coventry Link, who has supplied Western media with information on Syria the past years - is simply a MI6 front.
The CIA and other Western intel agencies hire and pay thousands of analysts and journalists to write the 'news'. No less problematic, from a democratic and anti-war perspective, is the apparatus' ability to pay big money to PR companies and hire thousands of people to smear and work against critical academics and journalists both under cover in the public and on the social media. A single PR company was paid $500 million dollars to do propaganda for the war on Iraq: "A former contractor for a UK-based public relations firm says that the Pentagon paid more than half a billion dollars for the production and dissemination of fake Al-Qaeda videos that portrayed the insurgent group in a negative light." 2016, The Independent LINK
This article can be considered critical important information. But such critical information always come too late, with the goal of backing up the media's own credibility so as to able to be function as effective tools for the next big lie and propaganda project. The only thing we can know for sure about the establishment media is that they will never tell the most important truths about their way of doing journalism for the corporate agenda. Just as they will never tell the truth that NATO has employed jihadist mercenaries for the past forty years, where media such as the BBC and the Independent still systematically suppress the truth and help lie for more of the corporate empire's wars. Link
The corporate powers even get useful idiots volunteering to support the apparatus, when for instance sincere 'critical' academics, lacking the skills to understand it all, voluntarily suppress themselves and everybody else, when they go out to defend the established media and write ridiculing texts about 'conspiracy theorists’.
This chaotic 'behemoth' public sphere, where nobody knows who and what to trust, is a great achivement. The politicians are never put to account. Everybody in the public sphere 'work together', from covert and overt hired hands to cunning intel agents, sincere and insincere politicians, academics and journalists, indistinguishable from each other, they simply present the peoples with a more or less uniform but mostly completely false information. This way, critical thinking and the truth on all subjects is systematically suppressed. This way, the Western peoples are presented with a most biased and often completely false corporate ordered information about reality. This way, we have gained a still more ‘totalitarian’ Western public sphere. This way, we can now more than ever appreciate the warning by the French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu, who said that the concerted assault on critical thought in the eighties and nineties is a great danger for our democracies.
The Evidence: the apparatus is as extremely powerful as it is dangerous. The information is so clearly false, when compared to the information available on the alternative media. But It is easy to understand if most people cannot imagine the description above to be the truth and prefer to think that the Western academics are trustworty, and that the media produce journalism.
But... there is an insurmountable logical problem, for the apparatus and all its implicated cunning-intel-hired-hands-and-non-critical-minded-useful-idiots-academics-journalists-and-neoliberal-politicians. That is, if one thinks about it. For the apparatus’ very success and still greater success in mobilizing the Western peoples to applaud consecutive state war crimes on a Nuremberg scale (destroying nation after nation with still less noteworthy academic, political and journalistic opposition and critique) is simply the greatest possible evidence of its totalitarian nature. When we apply critical historical knowledge on the former wars, what we know today, and confront it with the uniformly presented information given to us up to and under the wars, it is obvious that the Western public spheres have functioned as one big totalitarian apparatus.
To mention just one example. Today we know, and the British Parliament has acknowledged it as a fact, that basically all information leading up to and under the NATO war on Libya was false. We also remember - or can go back and check the given information - that there was No oppositional information back then. This lays bare the naked truth. Because, when we know today that basically all information was false and nobody contradicted the information then, it must be logically true that everbody talking about Libya then, all politicians, all academics and all media must have been telling the same lies. There is simply no way of denying this. It is what Karl Kraus and Ludwig Wittgenstein would call a one-and-a-half-truth.
This way, everybody can know for a fact that every period's information has shown up to be evidence that our states and public spheres are rotten to the core. This applies both to domestic and foreign policy.
To bear witness and enlighten people about the kind of totalitarian world we actually inhabit, I research to collect the best critical (= true) academic knowledge and journalistic information on different topics. Not least the former wars. People may find the most trustworthy information about the former wars and the totalitarian lies that accompanid them on my pages on Korea, Vietnam, Yugoslavia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and Syria etc.
The Big Picture: it's all about powerful conspiracies!09-12-2017 10:36 "Those who tell the stories rule society." - Plato
The Big Business People that were convicted at Nuremberg as being the real culprits running Hitler's 'Foreign Policy' for thirteen years only got a few years jail. While some of their ground men soldiers were hanged they were free i a couple of years. One of the Nazi generals even was appointed to head of NATO later...
It is the same Big Business that have run the world ever since. They had the US/CIA make the Great German Europe that they had Hitler 'working' on. The same Big business Power Relations destroyed Yugoslavia (together with MI6, CIA, British SAS special forces etc) on complete lies, fabrications and NATO's illegal bombs on Serbian civilian infrastructure etc.
It is the same Big Business that run the EU today - and more than ever. They destroyed Greece - also on complete lies (95% of the loans given to Greece went directly back to German, French, British etc. big shareholders that had given very risky loans to private banks in Greece - only the 95% loans were now 'nationalized' and thereby put on the Greek people as an even much bigger burden. So, the 'loans' were not loans but burden).
And the same scheme is going to be applied to other EU nations in the South that don't have their own currency. NB. Own currency = Own state = Own policies. Most economists don't protest the EU. Because either they don't know this (many of them) or they simply still want an EU with one currency. Why? Because that so would fit their 'pure' economic models on their minds. Please notice that everything important going on in the EU is happening behind closed doors. And that the Western media completely and lie, suppress and make propaganda on the EU issues, too.
That is because it is the same Big Business that run all the Western 'Foreign Policy' today and control the media. Where they are not in control they have had right wing 'globalist' enthusiastic politicians and journalists hired so that they will do and say, what Big Business want out of ideological reasons. It is enough, actually a qualification, if you are not too bright either as a journalist or as a politicians to fall their globalist propaganda, just look at the academic world that have promoted the 'globalist agenda' still more for the past thirty years. If you try to explain that the civil liberties, workers' rights and welfare state rights are all hung up on the national states, they still won't listen and says that the 'future' is globalism...
Here we come to the best part of it. The same Big Business had their CIA hitmen make even the very question of asking what is going on 'illegal'. That is, they fabricated the 'conspiracy meme' in the sixties and had it circulated all over the US media (later it is also over all the European media - as everybody knows). So, you cannot tell - in fact not even ask questions - about the Big Business, politics, media and 'intel agencies' connectedness of things as I lay out here.
The only differences between me and Colin Powell stating such a (hidden) conspiracy theory, are, that I am not working for Big Business that I care about people and that I mean what I say, when I say: 'These statements are not assertations, these statements are based on facts, solid facts'. Only the British Parliament have acknowledged that all the info on the war on Libya was false. But that is of course something. Important. So, why do the UK continue the exact same false, illegal and insane war on Syria. NATO systematically back, fund, arm, train, lead and bomb for al Nusra and ISIS in Syria. BBC just covered it up as a 'mistake'. They are corrupt. Completely.
I have made pages with relevant if not crucial information on all these subjects and many more. Not least on the factual knowledge we have today that the US/NATO wars killing millions of people on lies and propaganda for Big Business were all illegal - and actually as a matter of fact insanely more cruel than the nazis's 'wars'. NATO do not so much go into war, they more accurately destroy nations. So:
"You wouldn't know it. It never happened. Nothing ever happened. Even while it was happening it wasn't happening. It didn't matter. It was of no interest." Harold Pinter
That is all for now! I must run (boy to football ;) ) - sorry about misspellings etc.
Best
Lars
1
2
>
|
|
|
|
|
